1985
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.53.1.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocarditis confirmed by biopsy presenting as acute myocardial infarction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings correspond in part to changes observed in the ECG, which early in the disease also reflects a more focal involvement of the myocardium and even mimics acute myocardial infarction. 17,18 Analysis of the data with exclusion of the three patients with negative biopsy findings did not change the result.…”
Section: Endomyocardial Biopsymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These findings correspond in part to changes observed in the ECG, which early in the disease also reflects a more focal involvement of the myocardium and even mimics acute myocardial infarction. 17,18 Analysis of the data with exclusion of the three patients with negative biopsy findings did not change the result.…”
Section: Endomyocardial Biopsymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, when rigorous histological criteria are used, myocarditis is seldom diagnosed in patients with a clinical picture of dilated cardiomyopathy [6,9,10] . Another presentation of myocarditis more or less mimicks acute myocardial infarction [11][12][13][14] . In patients with this form, chest pain is the leading symptom, electrocardiography displays ST-segment elevations and markers of myocardial injury are found in the blood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] Nevertheless, the sensitivity of EMB remains low, which is explained by the focal manifestation of myocarditis. 10,26,27 EMB specimens are small 22 and are normally taken from the RV portion of the IVS without information about the localization of inflammatory foci. Therefore, it is likely that sampling errors are responsible for the low sensitivity and low negative predictive value reported.…”
Section: Endomyocardial Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%