2016
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2016.150735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myths concerning Woodward's ambiguity function: analysis and resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[84], Table 2). Woodward is known for first mentioning the sinc function [32,43,100,152,153] and his time-frequency ambiguity function [46,51,56,[154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161][162]. We now let g be the Dirac comb, it leads us to the following lemma [82,142].…”
Section: Definition 1 (Periodization and Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[84], Table 2). Woodward is known for first mentioning the sinc function [32,43,100,152,153] and his time-frequency ambiguity function [46,51,56,[154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161][162]. We now let g be the Dirac comb, it leads us to the following lemma [82,142].…”
Section: Definition 1 (Periodization and Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AF is not uniquely defined [8,9], including in the works of Woodward [6]. Further, later works have generalized this definition to handle larger bandwidth signals [10,11], long duration signals [12], volumetric scatterers [13,14], targets with high velocity [15,16], and angular domain [17][18][19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%