2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01440-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nadir prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
51
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
6
51
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Association between Gleason score and TTP was also reported in a previous study [19]. On the other hand, the impact of Gleason score on OS is controversial; some reported a positive relationship between them [11] and others negative [12,15,20,21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Association between Gleason score and TTP was also reported in a previous study [19]. On the other hand, the impact of Gleason score on OS is controversial; some reported a positive relationship between them [11] and others negative [12,15,20,21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In this situation, it is important to precisely evaluate the clinical efficacy of ADT consisting of traditional maximum androgen blockade (MAB) at this time. There have been several reports of outcomes from patients with prostate cancer treated with ADT [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]; however, the number of studies, that reported outcomes in patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer treated primarily with MAB without any local treatment, is limited. Recently, outcomes of MAB as an initial treatment for patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer have been reported, in which the significant impact of PSA kinetics not on OS but on disease progression was demonstrated [16].…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 All patients in our study achieved a nadir within 8 months (median time to nadir, 0.54 years; interquartile range, 0.32-0.65 years). Patients were followed every 3 to 6 months with serum PSA measurements and digital rectal examinations.…”
Section: Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These cut-off points were PSA nadir 0.2 ng/mL versus >0.2 ng/mL, 6,9 Gleason score 7 versus >8, 4 time to PSA failure <3 years versus !3 years, 4 PSA DT <3 months versus 3 to 6 months, 1,4 and pre-ADT PSA level 10 ng/ mL versus >10 ng/mL. The time to PSA nadir after ADT was analyzed as a continuous variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigators have demonstrated the prognostic significance of nadir PSA after androgen deprivation therapy for locally advanced and/or metastatic prostate cancer in terms of survival or progression to androgenindependent status. [19][20][21][22][23][24] The EORTC 30892 study has demonstrated that PSA response at 6 months after androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer can predict survival. 19 Median overall survival rates were 6.4, 3.8 and 2.3 years in patients with nadir PSA p1, 1-10 and 410 ng ml -1 , respectively.…”
Section: 9%mentioning
confidence: 99%