2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1593-5_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoparticles for In Vivo Lifetime Multiplexed Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[43][44][45] The lifetime-based thermometry of LLNs is less prone to the interference of absorption and scattering of biological tissue. [44,46] Nevertheless, the typical instrument for lifetime-based in vivo temperature monitoring is mainly composed of pulse light generation unit for excitation, synchronized optical unit for isolating luminescence decay, and signal detection unit, which brings about more overall technical complexity and cost. Additionally, lifetime imaging typically requires longer acquisition time, [47] which may not be conducive to the application in ischemic stroke, especially in the case of acute and critical stroke (sometimes in an unstable or extremely restless state) where time-saving diagnostic method is more favorable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45] The lifetime-based thermometry of LLNs is less prone to the interference of absorption and scattering of biological tissue. [44,46] Nevertheless, the typical instrument for lifetime-based in vivo temperature monitoring is mainly composed of pulse light generation unit for excitation, synchronized optical unit for isolating luminescence decay, and signal detection unit, which brings about more overall technical complexity and cost. Additionally, lifetime imaging typically requires longer acquisition time, [47] which may not be conducive to the application in ischemic stroke, especially in the case of acute and critical stroke (sometimes in an unstable or extremely restless state) where time-saving diagnostic method is more favorable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%