2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanostructuring lipid carriers using Ridolfia segetum (L.) Moris essential oil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For most formulations, the best fitting was obtained with the Korsmeyer–Peppas model. This model ( ) allows the characterization of the different release mechanisms through evaluation of the diffusion release exponent (n) [ 39 ]. The n values obtained for formulations F1, F2, F7, F9, F10, F11, and RF suggest that these formulations have a Fickian behaviour.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most formulations, the best fitting was obtained with the Korsmeyer–Peppas model. This model ( ) allows the characterization of the different release mechanisms through evaluation of the diffusion release exponent (n) [ 39 ]. The n values obtained for formulations F1, F2, F7, F9, F10, F11, and RF suggest that these formulations have a Fickian behaviour.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Korsmeyer-Peppas model ( k t c2 ) model allows us to characterize the different release mechanisms through the evaluation of the diffusion release exponent (c 2 ). Four scenarios may be possible: (i) c 2 close to 0.5—Fickian diffusion process, and non-Fickian diffusion process where (ii) 0.5 < c 2 < 1.0—anomalous transport, (iii) c 2 = 1.0—zero-order model, and finally (iv) c 2 >1.0—super case-II transport [ 81 ]. Taking into account this classification, it is seen that DoE formulations displayed a hybrid behavior between Fickian and anomalous (non-Fickian) transport [0.447 ± 0.024 (F 4 ) < c 2 < 0.629 ± 0.019 (F 12 )], ascribed to the differences in the microstructure network ( Table 8 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipid-based nanoparticles are one of the most promising nanoencapsulation systems in the food industry because of their favorable properties, including the capacity to encapsulate hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds in the same structure, targetability, production with food-grade materials, and application in diverse products without undesirable effects [63]. Another advantage of the encapsulation in lipid nanostructures is the cytotoxicity reduction of the antimicrobials as compared with their free form, as some reports describe the reduction of toxicity of antimicrobial peptides loaded in liposomes [64], essential oils loaded in NLC [65] and natural extracts encapsulated in NLC [66]. The encapsulation of antibacterial agents, in addition to the direct effect on bacterial cells, has also been reported to be effective against biofilms, preventing their formation on surfaces and destroying adhered films [67], and could play an outstanding role in the reduction of foodborne diseases, particularly those caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria.…”
Section: Encapsulation Of Natural Antimicrobials Into Lipid-based Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%