Narrative and Method in Ethics Consultation

These opening lines of "The Zadeh Scenario" (Finder 2018: 21) foretell, in certain ways, many if not most of the core questions and themes that emerge in the ensuing layers of peer review and commentary that constitute Parts Two, Three, and Four of this volume: What is the appropriate role (and expectations and goals) of clinical ethics consultation? What are the proper goods and practices associated with actually "doing" clinical ethics consultation-and hence serving as a clinical ethics consultant? More importantly-certainly for the sake of this book but also for the field of clinical ethics if it is to promote and support critical engagement among practitioners-what is the best way to capture this "doing" such that peers might be able to provide not merely critical analysis but helpful feedback and guidance? And underneath all three of these questions is yet a more basic and crucial question: what is the most appropriate frame by which we who perform clinical ethics consultation can share with and learn from each other about our performances as clinical ethics consultants-and engage in such sharing and learning as both individuals and as a field? The opening lines of "The Zadeh Scenario" also betray; while these lines serve as the beginning of Finder's narrative, they are not, as the reader comes to learn, the beginning of Finder's involvement with Mrs. Hamadani and her family: according

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Narrative and Method in Ethics Consultation

Abstract: When asked about the use of decision-making frameworks, over half of the responders to this question (28/50, 56%) reported using the 'four principles' approach in the previous

Cited by 3 publications

References 15 publications

Evaluating Clinical Ethics Support: On What Grounds Do We Make Judgments About Reports of Ethics Consultation?

Evaluating Clinical Ethics Support: On What Grounds Do We Make Judgments About Reports of Ethics Consultation?

Doing Well or Doing Good in Ethics Consultation

Peer Review and Responsibility in/as/for/to Practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About