2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nasal cavity volume changes after rapid maxillary expansion in adolescents evaluated with 3-dimensional simulation and modeling programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
38
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…9,18,27,28,32,33 The literature shows that patients presenting with maxillary constriction tend to have a higher nasal airway resistance. 34 The present study does not show a difference in nasal air passage volume at T0, but this may be due to the fact that patients with clinically normal respiratory functions for selected for both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9,18,27,28,32,33 The literature shows that patients presenting with maxillary constriction tend to have a higher nasal airway resistance. 34 The present study does not show a difference in nasal air passage volume at T0, but this may be due to the fact that patients with clinically normal respiratory functions for selected for both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23][24] Studies have also used this technology to evaluate the effects of RME over nasal airway. [25][26][27] However, most of the RME studies have not taken into account nasal and oropharyngeal airway volumes. 28,29 The objectives of this study were to evaluate the skeletal, dental, OP airway volume, and nasal passage (NP) volume changes that occur after RME treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nasal volume increase of 17% reported in this study was quite close to values published in previous studies. [8][9][10][11][12] Several articles focused on evaluating RME effects on MSV; Pangrazio-Kulbersh et al 4 noticed a significant increase of between 6% and 11%, while others 12 didn't find any significant difference in MSV. Maxillary volume modifications following RME have not been evaluated.…”
Section: 7-121921mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using 3D simulation and modeling programs, Gö rgü lü et al 11 found a significant nasal volume increase of 12.14%. A significant increase in nasal volume was shown also using acoustic rhinometry; 9 Babacan et al 8 estimated this increase to be 13.80% without decongestant and 15.16% with decongestant, while others 12 found a significant increase of nasal cavity volume by 15.20% and nasopharynx volume by 10 concluded that RME is usually accompanied by increases in area and volume of the nasal cavity, and these changes remained stable 3 months after treatment.…”
Section: 7-121921mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation