National innovation systems

Lundvall, B A

doi:10.4324/9781315588957-9

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…in the process of innovation has made it inevitable to pay attention to innovation as an interactive, networking and collaborative process (Zhang, 2013; Rad et al , 2015). The concept of the NIS theory is necessary because the relationship between actors in an innovation process is the key to the development of “innovative production.” The innovative development of a country largely depends on the level of interaction of these actors as elements of an innovation system (Nelson, 2013). Therefore, the evaluation of these actors’ interactions in the form of NIS evaluation can improve innovative production and development.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The NIS concept also changes policymakers’ attention to potential systemic deficiencies that may impede the innovative performance of the industry. Lack of interaction between the actors of this system, the discrepancy between basic research in the public sector and more applied research in industry, failures of technology transfer institutes and low absorbent capacity of companies may all contribute to the NIS weakness (Nelson, 2013). Therefore, countries’ NIS performance evaluation and comparison enable policymakers to tackle challenges more effectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Efficiency-effectiveness assessment of national innovation systems: comparative analysis

Bakhtiar

Ghazinoory

Aslani

et al. 2021

JSTPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present and evaluate the performance of innovation systems by considering two indicators of efficiency and effectiveness. The scope of the evaluation is globally and due to the situation of each country, the suggested strategies are proposed to maintain the status quo or move toward the desired situation for countries. Design/methodology/approach The approach is to compare and benchmark the countries in terms of the efficiency and effectiveness of their innovation system. The Global Innovation Index report’s input-to-output ratio and the global competitiveness report are used for the assessment. Findings The findings indicate that countries such as China, Switzerland and the USA have an efficient and effective innovation system. However, the innovation systems in countries such as Brazil and Zimbabwe are not only inefficient but also ineffective. The findings also indicate that the innovation systems of countries such as Iran, Armenia and Egypt are efficient but ineffective. Finally, the authors can name Australia, Qatar and Russia as countries with effective but inefficient innovation systems. Originality/value Assessment of national innovation system using efficiency and effectiveness performances is done for the first time at the global stage.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%