2018
DOI: 10.1111/emr.12317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National standards: Reasserting the ecological restoration framework in uncertain times

Abstract: National ecological restoration standards – produced in 2016 through the collaboration of 13 of Australia's leading ecological restoration organisations – are increasingly influencing practitioners. This paper elucidates two of the Key Principles that underpin standards to encourage highest and best efforts across all sectors and help resolve uncertainty about the role of restoration in a changing world.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than leading to perfunctory “box‐ticking” (Higgs et al ), the SER Standards juxtapose high aspiration, realistic goal‐setting, and transparent reporting. For example, restoration projects, including those at severely modified sites where full recovery is most often not an appropriate goal, have benefited from the improved capacity to define and evaluate their ecosystem's attributes (McDonald et al ; McDonald & Dixon 2018).…”
Section: The Ser Standards Operationalize the Principles Of Ecologicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than leading to perfunctory “box‐ticking” (Higgs et al ), the SER Standards juxtapose high aspiration, realistic goal‐setting, and transparent reporting. For example, restoration projects, including those at severely modified sites where full recovery is most often not an appropriate goal, have benefited from the improved capacity to define and evaluate their ecosystem's attributes (McDonald et al ; McDonald & Dixon 2018).…”
Section: The Ser Standards Operationalize the Principles Of Ecologicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(It should be noted, however, that current Standards for ecological restoration promote approaches that conspicuously take functional attributes and ecosystem change into account McDonald et al . ; Standards Reference Group SERA ; McDonald & Dixon ). In Australia's Murray–Darling Basin, for example, riparian restoration targets for environmental water management typically entail the maintenance or restoration of extent of particular vegetation communities relative to some baseline, for example pre‐European settlement or at the time of listing as Ramsar sites (Capon & Capon ).…”
Section: Key Considerations For Robust Riparian Restoration In the Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive, irreversible modification of catchments, along with climate change, means that historic or other reference conditions may no longer represent defensible, feasible or appropriate targets for riparian restoration (Choi et al . ; McDonald & Dixon ). On the other hand, open‐ended restoration strategies (i.e.…”
Section: Key Considerations For Robust Riparian Restoration In the Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations