2016
DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National survey on the practice of radiation therapists in Australia

Abstract: IntroductionRadiation therapy (RT), like many allied health professions, has lacked professional practice clarity, which until 2008 had not been comprehensively investigated. This manuscript describes the first phase of a three‐phase project investigating the current and future practices of radiation therapists (RTs) in Australia. The aim of phase 1 was to define the practice of RTs in Australia.MethodsA quantitative approach was used to gain an understanding of RT practice. A national survey was distributed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review identified six potential roles and noted that none were present in Australia at the time of publication. A survey of national practice notes that some advanced practice roles did exist but that they were locally driven and without formal structure. Another review reported that little development had been made towards advanced practice roles in Australia but elements of extended practice were being undertaken, including CT planning, verification, patient weekly reviews, and planning and delivery of brachytherapy treatment …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review identified six potential roles and noted that none were present in Australia at the time of publication. A survey of national practice notes that some advanced practice roles did exist but that they were locally driven and without formal structure. Another review reported that little development had been made towards advanced practice roles in Australia but elements of extended practice were being undertaken, including CT planning, verification, patient weekly reviews, and planning and delivery of brachytherapy treatment …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confusion regarding the ‘radiation therapist’ role may contribute to a lack of patient satisfaction, information provision and psychosocial support. The role is defined by RTs and patients as encompassing technical, information and supportive care components . While the RT role will vary across departments, clear definitions and expectations could focus RT interactions and increase patient satisfaction, while ensuring patient needs are met.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RTs’ primary roles are patient care, radiation planning and treatment delivery. Their role incorporates patient education, including explanation and co‐ordination of procedures and appointments, and providing advice regarding personal care during treatment . In fulfilling these roles, RTs need to spend time with patients to ensure their information needs are met and that they are willing to proceed with treatment .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within radiation therapy, there is a move towards advanced practice that would provide opportunities for RTs to specialise within their jobs (Radiation Oncology Tripartite Committee, 2012; Sale et al, 2016) and which has been successful in the UK and Canada (Department of Health, 2003;Harnett, Bak, Zychla, & Lockhart, 2014). Career development and advancement opportunities were particularly difficult for RTs to find, and also for ROMPs in junior roles.…”
Section: Implications For Workforce Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Career development and advancement opportunities were particularly difficult for RTs to find, and also for ROMPs in junior roles. However, there are currently few RTs practising as advanced practitioners and these roles are often not officially recognised and may not attract additional salary (Sale et al, 2016). Within radiation therapy, there is a move towards advanced practice that would provide opportunities for RTs to specialise within their jobs (Radiation Oncology Tripartite Committee, 2012; Sale et al, 2016) and which has been successful in the UK and Canada (Department of Health, 2003;Harnett, Bak, Zychla, & Lockhart, 2014).…”
Section: Implications For Workforce Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%