2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4842-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native rotational knee kinematics are lost in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty when the tibial component is replaced

Abstract: The rotational kinematics of the native knee are not always preserved after BCR TKA. Native rotational kinematics are preserved after meniscectomy and femoral replacement, but are lost after tibial replacement in BCR TKA. Surgeons should pay close attention to maintain the anteroposterior stabilizing function of the ACL in BCR TKA, rather than to restore the native rotational kinematics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,5 A number of in vitro and computational studies have demonstrated that the knee joint stability after BCR TKA in the anterior–posterior, internal–external, and valgus–varus directions is similar to that of the native knee. 47 Similarly, long-term clinical studies of BCR TKA found satisfactory survivorship and function after more than 20 years of in vivo use and greater patient preference compared to conventional TKA. 8 Furthermore, recent short-term studies with a modern BCR TKA found greater patient reported satisfaction and reduced joint awareness in BCR patients compared to patients with conventional TKA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5 A number of in vitro and computational studies have demonstrated that the knee joint stability after BCR TKA in the anterior–posterior, internal–external, and valgus–varus directions is similar to that of the native knee. 47 Similarly, long-term clinical studies of BCR TKA found satisfactory survivorship and function after more than 20 years of in vivo use and greater patient preference compared to conventional TKA. 8 Furthermore, recent short-term studies with a modern BCR TKA found greater patient reported satisfaction and reduced joint awareness in BCR patients compared to patients with conventional TKA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Moreover, several studies have demonstrated that the kinematics of knees that underwent BCR-TKA differed from that of normal knees during passive flexion, passive extension, sit-to-stand exercises, deep lunges, and stair climbing. [11][12][13] Arauz et al reported that these kinematic differences between BCR-TKA knees and normal knees might be attributed to the articular surface. 13 The Journey II XR total knee arthroplasty system (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) has a medial concave and lateral convex articular design of the tibial insert.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total number of 127 entries (excluding duplicates) were obtained based on the keywords enhanced database query on MEDLINE and Web of Science since 2010. After implementing the exclusion criteria, five in-vitro studies that tested the Vanguard XP system (Zimmer Biomet) using cadaveric knee specimens were selected for analysis [2][3][4][5][6]. All five studies reported the tibiofemoral internal rotation during passive flexion ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b). Four studies reported the anteroposterior tibiofemoral contact (dynamic translations [3][4][5] or static locations [2]) and only two studies reported the valgus rotations [3,5]. In terms of knee loading, all five in-vitro studies included data measured from passive knee flexion under non-weight bearing, and two studies also collected knee kinematics data under quadriceps and hamstring loading conditions [3,5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%