Nativist policy: the comparative effects of Trumpian politics on migration decisions

Duch, Raymond M.; Laroze, Denise; Reinprecht, Constantin; Robinson, Thomas

doi:10.1017/psrm.2020.33

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Conjoint survey experiments are frequently employed to identify the importance individuals attribute to different features or characteristics of choices ( 24 ). Examples include environmental migrants ( 25 ), asylum seekers ( 26 ), and migration destinations ( 27 ). Ref.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Citizens from 13 countries share similar preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocation priorities

Duch

Roope

Violato

et al. 2021

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How does the public want a COVID-19 vaccine to be allocated? We conducted a conjoint experiment asking 15,536 adults in 13 countries to evaluate 248,576 profiles of potential vaccine recipients who varied randomly on five attributes. Our sample includes diverse countries from all continents. The results suggest that in addition to giving priority to health workers and to those at high risk, the public favors giving priority to a broad range of key workers and to those with lower income. These preferences are similar across respondents of different education levels, incomes, and political ideologies, as well as across most surveyed countries. The public favored COVID-19 vaccines being allocated solely via government programs but were highly polarized in some developed countries on whether taking a vaccine should be mandatory. There is a consensus among the public on many aspects of COVID-19 vaccination, which needs to be taken into account when developing and communicating rollout strategies.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Citizens from 13 countries share similar preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocation priorities

Duch

Roope

Violato

et al. 2021

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ashok, Kuziemko, and Washington (2015), Charite, Fisman, and Kuziemko (2016), Karadja, Mollerstrom, and Seim (2017), and Kuziemko et al (2014) use experimental designs through online platforms to understand people's views about fairness and redistributive preferences. 5 Cruces, Perez-Truglia, and Tetaz (2013) study how people form their perceptions of the income distribution and how this shapes their support for redistribution. Ariely and Norton (2011) also document the biased perceptions of the income distribution.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…See alsoGottschalk and Spolaore (2002) 5. In the social psychology literature, Chambers, Swan, and Heesacker (2015) confirm that perceptions of social mobility in the United States are deeply divided across party lines.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution

Alesina

Stantcheva

Teso

2018

American Economic Review

692

483

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using new cross-country survey and experimental data, we investigate how beliefs about intergenerational mobility affect preferences for redistribution in France, Italy, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Americans are more optimistic than Europeans about social mobility. Our randomized treatment shows pessimistic information about mobility and increases support for redistribution, mostly for “equality of opportunity” policies. We find strong political polarization. Left-wing respondents are more pessimistic about mobility: their preferences for redistribution are correlated with their mobility perceptions; and they support more redistribution after seeing pessimistic information. None of this is true for right-wing respondents, possibly because they see the government as a “problem” and not as the “solution.” (JEL D63, D72, H23, H24, J31, J62)

show abstract

“…Conjoint survey experiments are frequently employed to identify the importance individuals attribute to different features or characteristics of choices ( 23 ). Examples include environmental migrants ( 24 ), asylum seekers ( 25 ) and migration destinations ( 26 ). Awad et al ( 27 ) employed conjoint experiments that generate 40 million decisions to determine the ethical principles the public thinks should guide machine behavior.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who should be first in line for the COVID-19 vaccine? Surveys in 13 countries of the public’s preferences for prioritisation

Duch

Roope

Violato

et al. 2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How does the public want a COVID-19 vaccine to be allocated? We conducted a conjoint experiment asking 15,536 adults in 13 countries to evaluate 248,576 profiles of potential vaccine recipients that varied randomly on five attributes. Our sample includes diverse countries from all continents. The results suggest that in addition to giving priority to health workers and to those at high risk, the public favours giving priority to a broad range of key workers and to those on lower incomes. These preferences are similar across respondents of different education levels, incomes, and political ideologies, as well as across most surveyed countries. The public favoured COVID-19 vaccines being allocated solely via government programs, but were highly polarized in some developed countries on whether taking a vaccine should be mandatory. There is a consensus among the public on many aspects of COVID-19 vaccination which needs to be taken into account when developing and communicating roll-out strategies.

show abstract

Nativist policy: the comparative effects of Trumpian politics on migration decisions

Cited by 7 publications

References 26 publications

Citizens from 13 countries share similar preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocation priorities

Citizens from 13 countries share similar preferences for COVID-19 vaccine allocation priorities

Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution

Who should be first in line for the COVID-19 vaccine? Surveys in 13 countries of the public’s preferences for prioritisation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About