2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Language Processing in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications, Bias, and Reporting Transparency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computer vision and NLP have been identified as potentially powerful tools for surgical outcome prediction in the spine domain [16,17]. However, as of 2022, there were no computer vision tools [18] or NLP tools [19] widely used for diagnostics in spine surgery. The utilization of outdated models with low complexity has been identified as a limitation prohibiting clinical use [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Computer vision and NLP have been identified as potentially powerful tools for surgical outcome prediction in the spine domain [16,17]. However, as of 2022, there were no computer vision tools [18] or NLP tools [19] widely used for diagnostics in spine surgery. The utilization of outdated models with low complexity has been identified as a limitation prohibiting clinical use [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as of 2022, there were no computer vision tools [18] or NLP tools [19] widely used for diagnostics in spine surgery. The utilization of outdated models with low complexity has been identified as a limitation prohibiting clinical use [19]. The large amount of data needed to train these advanced models have restricted their development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of NLP techniques in spine surgery has seen a rise in the recent years and is projected to rapidly grow in the future ( 23 , 24 ). The ability of NLP to perform precise automated surveillance of operative notes, to answer clinically relevant questions, serves to reduce the burden of time-intensive and error-prone reviews by clinical coders ( 25 , 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were able to identify patients who required additional operations within 30 days to assess outcomes and quality metrics. 8…”
Section: Breaking Down Barriers In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%