DOI: 10.1159/000412316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nature of the Misidentified in the Capgras Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, it was believed that there was a narrow specificity to the delusion and that the 'misidentification' served to resolve ambiva lent feelings about the object; Berson [24] summed up and Sinkman [25] provided a cri tique of the arguments in favor of the role of early relationships, as well as primitive de fense mechanisms (especially splitting). How ever, the sense of delusional substitution of inanimate objects or irrelevant, unfamiliar persons [6], and the phenomenon of increas ing numbers of substitutes (the 'delirium of doubles') vitiates these theories [7], The atti tudes of patients range across friendliness, ambivalence, neutrality and hostility; ambi valence and hostility seemed to be more a function of the diagnosis of schizophrenia than other factors [26]. Conflicts may play a role in precipitating the delusion but this can be confounded by retrospective distortions [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, it was believed that there was a narrow specificity to the delusion and that the 'misidentification' served to resolve ambiva lent feelings about the object; Berson [24] summed up and Sinkman [25] provided a cri tique of the arguments in favor of the role of early relationships, as well as primitive de fense mechanisms (especially splitting). How ever, the sense of delusional substitution of inanimate objects or irrelevant, unfamiliar persons [6], and the phenomenon of increas ing numbers of substitutes (the 'delirium of doubles') vitiates these theories [7], The atti tudes of patients range across friendliness, ambivalence, neutrality and hostility; ambi valence and hostility seemed to be more a function of the diagnosis of schizophrenia than other factors [26]. Conflicts may play a role in precipitating the delusion but this can be confounded by retrospective distortions [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence consistent with this claim. It has often been remarked that, whilst it is initially voiced for close relatives, the Capgras delusion does gradually 'spread' to encompass others (Wallis 1986), as would be expected as the patient gradually becomes aware of the extent of the abnormality in emotional responding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mind t3 Language tive relationship with the misidentified person, and Wallis (1986) also noted in a review of cases that around 30% were friendly toward the duplicates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%