Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications 2009
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53348-7.00013-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NDT Transportation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…GPR is increasingly being used as a non‐destructive testing method and subsurface imaging technique for the evaluation of structural integrity, geometry, configuration and physical properties of industrial transportation and civil infrastructure resources (Saarenketo ), geological features and archaeology at cultural heritage structures (Pérez‐Grarcia et al . ; Santos‐Assunçao et al .…”
Section: Gpr and Laser‐scan Acquisition And Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GPR is increasingly being used as a non‐destructive testing method and subsurface imaging technique for the evaluation of structural integrity, geometry, configuration and physical properties of industrial transportation and civil infrastructure resources (Saarenketo ), geological features and archaeology at cultural heritage structures (Pérez‐Grarcia et al . ; Santos‐Assunçao et al .…”
Section: Gpr and Laser‐scan Acquisition And Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPR is increasingly being used as a non-destructive testing method and subsurface imaging technique for the evaluation of structural integrity, geometry, configuration and physical properties of industrial transportation and civil infrastructure resources (Saarenketo 2009), geological features and archaeology at cultural heritage structures (Pérez-Grarcia et al 2013;Santos-Assunçao et al 2014;Ranieri et al 2016). Numerous recent studies, however, have used terrestrial laser scan (TLS) and photogrammetry techniques at archaeological and architectural heritage sites to aid documentation, assessment, modelling, monitoring, management and preservation planning (El-Hakim et al 2007;Pavlidis et al 2007;Alkheder, Al-shawabkh and Haala 2009;Domingo et al 2013;Núñez, Buill and Edo 2013;Tapete et al 2013;Yang, Xu and Neumann 2014;Castellazzi et al 2015;Constanzo et al 2015;Hakonen, Kuusela and Okkonen 2015;Jaklič et al 2015;Plisson and Zotkina 2015; Altunas, Yildiz and Scaioni 2016 -amongst many others), but less frequently in conjunction with other near-surface geophysical data (Entwistle, MCCaffrey and Abrahams 2009;Lubowiecka et al, 2009Lubowiecka et al, , 2011Rogers 2014;Watters and Wilkes 2014).…”
Section: G P R a N D L A S E R -S C A N A C Q U I S I T I O N A N D Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is then used for an assortment of applications in subsurface EM sensing including rebar detection, thickness measurements, or identification of voids and cracks. [9][10][11] Radar technology is not just limited to GPR. Developments of a wideband subsurface imaging radar for the distant inspection of civil infrastructures have also been recently reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common way of doing this calibration in Finland is to drill a core and then correlate the measured air void content to the measured ε 0 r of the pavement (Roimela, 1998;Saarenketo, 2009). It has been also suggested that only one or two cores are needed to do this calibration (Saarenketo and Scullion, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%