2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45553-1_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near Infrared Extragalactic Background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using their argument that the fluctuations are 5-10% of the CIB, we have multiplied their fluctuation limits at these wavelengths by 15 to obtain the implied upper limits on the CIB shown in Table 2, results entirely consistent with those explicitly stated by Kashlinsky et al (1996b). Matsumoto et al (2000) studied sky brightness fluctuations in the IRTS data. After removing the discernible stars and large-scale features, they found a fluctuation spectrum which was dominated by read-out noise at wavelengths longer than 2.6 µm.…”
Section: Fluctuation Analysissupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using their argument that the fluctuations are 5-10% of the CIB, we have multiplied their fluctuation limits at these wavelengths by 15 to obtain the implied upper limits on the CIB shown in Table 2, results entirely consistent with those explicitly stated by Kashlinsky et al (1996b). Matsumoto et al (2000) studied sky brightness fluctuations in the IRTS data. After removing the discernible stars and large-scale features, they found a fluctuation spectrum which was dominated by read-out noise at wavelengths longer than 2.6 µm.…”
Section: Fluctuation Analysissupporting
confidence: 61%
“…He interpreted the largest standard deviation in his four fields as an upper limit on CIB fluctuations, since there were potential non-cosmic contributions to the fluctuations which he ignored. Wright's 1.25 µm upper limit is somewhat lower than the 92% confidence interval for the detection of Kashlinsky & Odenwald (2000) and well below the data of Matsumoto et al (2000) ( Table 2). His 2.2 µm limit is below the detections reported by Matsumoto et al and Kashlinsky & Odenwald, though within the 92% confidence interval of Kashlinsky & Odenwald.…”
Section: Fluctuation Analysismentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Measurements based upon COBE data are as shown in Figure 1 (see Table 1 for references) . The recently reported ClB measurement from the IRTS mission (Matsumoto et al 2000) is shown as a curve from 1.4-4.0 usu. The detections at UV-optical wavelengths are from the recent report by Bernstein (1999) (vl v == 12, 15, and 18 nW m-2 sr-I at 0.3, 0.55 and 0.8 ust: respectively).…”
Section: Summary and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%