2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neck transection level and postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study of 195 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven studies [ 16 , 27 , 29 , 32 , 33 , 38 , 39 ] analyzed the relationship of pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm and CR-POPF, involving 12,325 patients. The fixed effects model was used for data synthesis because of a low heterogeneity ( I 2 = 28%) among the 7 studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Seven studies [ 16 , 27 , 29 , 32 , 33 , 38 , 39 ] analyzed the relationship of pancreatic duct diameter <3 mm and CR-POPF, involving 12,325 patients. The fixed effects model was used for data synthesis because of a low heterogeneity ( I 2 = 28%) among the 7 studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association of vascular resection and CR-POPF was assessed by 6 studies with 5462 patients. [ 20 , 21 , 28 , 32 , 33 , 36 ] There was no heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%), so the fixed-effects model was adopted. The result showed that intraoperative vascular resection was a significant protective factor of CR-POPF (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.39–0.83, P = .003) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 37 studies 10,11,[28][29][30]33,34,37,39,44,45,[48][49][50][51][52][53]55,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64]72,74,75,77,81,83,87,87,[123][124][125] with 14,471 patients investigated MPD diameter as a risk factor for CR-POPF, applying different cut-offs. Irrespective of the cut-off, duct diameter was associated with CR-POPF (OR 3.14, 95% CI 2.53-3.90, P < 0.01) (Fig.…”
Section: Association Of Mpd Size and Popfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, results were comparable when including only the 49 studies that assessed the MPD intraoperatively (OR 3.21, 95% CI 2.70-3.81, P < 0.01) The studies included for analysis used different cutoff values for MPD diameter. Twelve studies 10,44,55,59,63,72,75,77,81,83,123,124 including 4660 patients classified MPD diameter of r 3mm as a high risk for CR-POPF development (OR 2.99, 95% CI 2.17-4.13, P < 0.01). Another 20 studies 11,29,30,33,37,39,44,45,[48][49][50][51]58,61,62,64,74,79,87,125 with 9067 patients used MPD diameter of ≤3 mm as the high-risk cut-off, although the results were comparable (OR 3.66, 95% CI 2.62-5.12, P < 0.01).…”
Section: Association Of Mpd Size and Popfmentioning
confidence: 99%