2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Need for cognition and rumination: Alternate explanations for sex differences in disaster information seeking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such low NFC can hinder the generation of positive and helpful thoughts over time. Moreover, it has been thought that persons low in NFC are less likely to seek and process CURIOSITY AND MENTAL HEALTH 3 information adaptively and thus to develop a sense of heightened psychological well-being across time in part due to chronic discomfort with uncertain, stressful, and ambiguous situations (Iannello, Mottini, Tirelli, Riva, & Antonietti, 2017;Lachlan, Hutter, Gilbert, & Spence, 2021).…”
Section: Revised Manuscript (Clean Version)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such low NFC can hinder the generation of positive and helpful thoughts over time. Moreover, it has been thought that persons low in NFC are less likely to seek and process CURIOSITY AND MENTAL HEALTH 3 information adaptively and thus to develop a sense of heightened psychological well-being across time in part due to chronic discomfort with uncertain, stressful, and ambiguous situations (Iannello, Mottini, Tirelli, Riva, & Antonietti, 2017;Lachlan, Hutter, Gilbert, & Spence, 2021).…”
Section: Revised Manuscript (Clean Version)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The articles selected for analysis were heterogenous in terms of the methodologies they employed (see Table 1). While there is no clear predominant approach, there are more works of a quantitative character (Bateman and Edwards 2002;Soetanto et al 2017;Cvetković et al 2018;Rohli et al 2018;Augustine et al 2019;Oliveira et al 2020;Wei et al 2020;Jayasekara et al 2021;Khan et al 2021;Lachlan et al 2021) compared with those taking a qualitative approach (Cupples 2007;Hamilton and Halvorson 2007;Dhungel and Ojha 2012;Tyler and Fairbrother 2018;Hou and Wu 2020;Walker et al 2020;De Silva 2021;Dema Moreno et al 2022) or those employing a mixed methodology (Bradshaw 2001;Alam and Collins 2010;Silver and Andrey 2014;Whittaker et al 2016;Reyes and Lu 2017;Kang et al 2021;Oktari et al 2021).…”
Section: The Use Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the data collection techniques used by the articles taking a quantitative approach, the first point of note is that half of them have a sufficiently large probabilistic sample to make them statistically representative of the population as a whole (Bateman and Edwards 2002;Cvetković et al 2018;Augustine et al 2019;Wei et al 2020;Khan et al (1970,1985,1991,1997,1998 2021). The other half do not meet the criteria to be considered representative, as they use non-probability sampling (Soetanto et al 2017;Rohli et al 2018;Jayasekara et al 2021;Lachlan et al 2021;Oliveira et al 2020). Furthermore, two of the studies do not provide methodological information about the composition of the sample in terms of sex/gender, despite them analysing these variables in the results (Jayasekara et al 2021;Lachlan et al 2021).…”
Section: The Use Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations