Needs Assessment in Land Administration: The Potential of the Nominal Group Technique

Abstract

This paper introduces the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) for conducting needs assessments in land administration projects. Understanding the local context of what citizens, communities and organisations need remains a complex challenge yet fundamental to the success of land administration projects. To date, key methods of understanding and identifying local needs have been qualitative in nature with various strengths and limitations. For land administration, it is also important for empirical methods to attend to power imbalances amongst participants that are a hallmark and driver of land tenure security. Although NGT has hardly been used in the domain of land administration, based on our experience of employing the method in a research project in East Africa, we argue that it presents a valuable addition to needs assessment strategies. We provide a broad outline of the method before providing a detailed description of how we employed the method. We discuss the opportunities and challenges that NGT offers, arguing that it is a time and resource efficient way of engaging communities in a participatory and equitable process which facilitates the co-production of valid and reliable knowledge on needs, and consensus on how these needs should be prioritised.

Governance assessment of the UAVs implementation in Rwanda under the fit-for-purpose land administration approach

“…An overview of the different conducted interviews per type of stakeholder is presented in Table 2: To assess each FFP element, we contrasted the different interviewees' answers and the experiences of the test flights. This process was further supported by academic literature and international organisations' reports such as the World Bank, Land Governance Assessment Framework Final Report-Rwanda (Ngoga et al, 2017), academic publications (Ho et al, 2018(Ho et al, , 2017bStöcker et al, 2019Stöcker et al, , 2018b and various national strategy documents such as the SMART Rwanda Master Plan (Republic of Rwanda, 2015). The final result was compared with Table 3.…”

Innovative Remote Sensing Methodologies for Kenyan Land Tenure Mapping

“…It also produces outcomes that have been found to be robust and meaningful while still being time-and resource-efficient process [43]. A more detailed explanation is provided in [44]. The assessment of the needs was completed prior to other fieldwork: Data was collected from representatives from a range of county government office functions (surveying, registration, planning), as well as county-level officials.…”

Innovative Geospatial Solutions for Land Tenure Mapping

“…During the sessions, several questions were asked, and after two hours, all answers were discussed and ranked based on voting. A more detailed explanation is provided in (Ho, Pattyn, Broucker, & Crompvoets, 2018). The needs assessment activities were done before the fieldworks and workshops related to tool development.…”