2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-9964(00)00056-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative priming in schizophrenia: effects of masking and prime presentation time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
27
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Park and colleagues (1996) noted regular spatial NP in chronic outpatients, but no NP in acutely psychotic inpatients. Interestingly, deficits in NP were associated with the length (and masking) of stimulus presentation and with the length of response stimulus intervals (Moritz et al, 2001;Salo et al, 2002) prompting Moritz and colleagues to suggest that reduced NP may be due to perceptual deficits rather than deficits in inhibition. This assumption is difficult to maintain, however, since reduced NP has been reported in studies with large RSIs (Park et al, 1996;Sturgill & Ferraro, 1997;Zimmermann et al, 2006) and with long or response-dependent stimulus representation (Fuller et al, 2000;MacQueen et al, 2003;Park et al, 1996;Sturgill & Ferraro, 1997).…”
Section: Which Variables Can Explain Individual Differences In Np?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park and colleagues (1996) noted regular spatial NP in chronic outpatients, but no NP in acutely psychotic inpatients. Interestingly, deficits in NP were associated with the length (and masking) of stimulus presentation and with the length of response stimulus intervals (Moritz et al, 2001;Salo et al, 2002) prompting Moritz and colleagues to suggest that reduced NP may be due to perceptual deficits rather than deficits in inhibition. This assumption is difficult to maintain, however, since reduced NP has been reported in studies with large RSIs (Park et al, 1996;Sturgill & Ferraro, 1997;Zimmermann et al, 2006) and with long or response-dependent stimulus representation (Fuller et al, 2000;MacQueen et al, 2003;Park et al, 1996;Sturgill & Ferraro, 1997).…”
Section: Which Variables Can Explain Individual Differences In Np?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NP was reduced for schizophrenic patients in the 100ms-with-mask condition but not in the other three conditions (Moritz et al, 2001). They concluded that the attenuation of NP for schizophrenia patients is observed only under special experimental conditions and is caused by an inability to perceive a briefly presented stimulus (Moritz et al, 2001). However, backward masking should affect both ignored repetition and control trials.…”
Section: Review Of the Negative Priming Effect In Schizophrenia And Smentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moritz et al (2000) and Moritz, Ruff, Wilke, Andresen, Krausz, & Naber (2001) have examined different aspects of the NP paradigms to determine the contribution of perceptual versus attentional deficits to NP by investigating the potential effects of backward masking, prime and probe presentation time, and stimulus-onsetasynchrony (SOA). Moritz et al, (2000) manipulated the response-to-stimulus interval (RSI) to determine if the NP effect was intact in schizophrenia but was maintained for a shorter period than healthy controls.…”
Section: Review Of the Negative Priming Effect In Schizophrenia And Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations