2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal brain MRI segmentation: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(206 reference statements)
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of techniques have been proposed for tissue segmentation of the neonatal brain in recent years: unsupervised techniques (Gui et al, 2012), atlas fusion techniques (Weisenfeld and Warfield, 2009;Gousias et al, 2013;Kim et al, 2016), parametric techniques (Prastawa et al, 2005;Song et al, 2007;Xue et al, 2007;Shi et al, 2010;Cardoso et al, 2013;Makropoulos et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2012;Wu and Avants, 2012;Beare et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2016), classification techniques (Anbeek et al, 2008;Srhoj-Egekher et al, 2012;Chiţȃ et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2015;Sanroma et al, 2016;Moeskops et al, 2016) and deformable models (Wang et al, 2011;Dai et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013Wang et al, , 2014. A review of neonatal segmentation methods can be found in Devi et al (2015); Makropoulos et al (2017). The majority of these techniques have been applied to images with a lower resolution than those acquired within the dHCP, and typically to images of preterm-born subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of techniques have been proposed for tissue segmentation of the neonatal brain in recent years: unsupervised techniques (Gui et al, 2012), atlas fusion techniques (Weisenfeld and Warfield, 2009;Gousias et al, 2013;Kim et al, 2016), parametric techniques (Prastawa et al, 2005;Song et al, 2007;Xue et al, 2007;Shi et al, 2010;Cardoso et al, 2013;Makropoulos et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2012;Wu and Avants, 2012;Beare et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2016), classification techniques (Anbeek et al, 2008;Srhoj-Egekher et al, 2012;Chiţȃ et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2015;Sanroma et al, 2016;Moeskops et al, 2016) and deformable models (Wang et al, 2011;Dai et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013Wang et al, , 2014. A review of neonatal segmentation methods can be found in Devi et al (2015); Makropoulos et al (2017). The majority of these techniques have been applied to images with a lower resolution than those acquired within the dHCP, and typically to images of preterm-born subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of neonatal brain MRI segmentation methods can be found in (Devi et al, 2015). To the best of our knowledge, only few studies focus on the segmentation of 6-month infant brain images with risk of autism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding thickness maps shown on the outer surface by LINKS and the proposed work are provided in (e) and (h), respectively [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] (<3 months of age) brain images with relatively high tissue contrast in T2-weighted image. Related reviews on neonatal brain MRI segmentation methods can be found in Devi, Chandrasekharan, Sundararaman, and Alex (2015) and Makropoulos, Counsell, and Rueckert (2017). To the best of our knowledge, only few studies focus on the segmentation of 6-month infant brain images with risk of autism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atlas-based segmentation is a well-established concept that has been widely applied to brain structures [166168]. Its application to adipose tissue segmentation is a logical extension, and the paradigm is schematically illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Common Segmentation Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%