2016
DOI: 10.5751/es-08618-210250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networking for conservation: social capital and perceptions of organizational success among land trust boards

Abstract: ABSTRACT. As an important component in collaborative natural resource management and nonprofit governance, social capital is expected to be related to variations in the performance of land trusts. Land trusts are charitable organizations that work to conserve private land locally, regionally, or nationally. The purpose of this paper is to identify the level of structural and cognitive social capital among local land trusts, and how these two types of social capital relate to the perceived success of land trust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous small scale efforts of the non-public nature field protection can be detected throughout Europe and world-wide-such as land trust movements (Ruseva et al 2016;Bastian et al 2017), Audubon society (Merchant 2010), etc. Different nongovernmental non-profit organizations (NGOs) play an important role in this process as they gain private or public resources for buying the land and change its management (including the wetland protection or re-establishment, renaturalization of small water streams, etc.).…”
Section: Scaling-up Potential?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous small scale efforts of the non-public nature field protection can be detected throughout Europe and world-wide-such as land trust movements (Ruseva et al 2016;Bastian et al 2017), Audubon society (Merchant 2010), etc. Different nongovernmental non-profit organizations (NGOs) play an important role in this process as they gain private or public resources for buying the land and change its management (including the wetland protection or re-establishment, renaturalization of small water streams, etc.).…”
Section: Scaling-up Potential?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kepercayaan adalah harapan yang tumbuh di dalam masyarakat yang ditunjukkan oleh adanya prilaku jujur, teratur, dan kerjasama berdasarkan norma yang ada (Ruseva, Farmer, & Chancellor, 2016 (Radnitz, Wheatley, & Zürcher, 2009). Kepercayaan sosial efektif dikembangkan melalui jalinan pola hubungan sosial resiprosikal atau timbal balik antar pihak yang terlibat dan berkelanjutan.…”
Section: B Kepercayaan Dan Solidaritas Dalam Pengelolaan Mata Airunclassified
“…Terbentuknya jaringan sosial dalam pengelolaan mata air di Ngaram-aram adalah suatu strategi adaptasi masyarakat untuk menyesuaikan dengan lingkungan dalam memperoleh air untuk kebutuhan rumah tangga maupun irigasi yang menyusun modal sosial dengan komponen-komponen lain berupa normanorma, kepercayaan, resiprositas dan solidaritas. Bentuk modal sosial dalam pengelolaan mata air di Ngaram-aram adalah modal sosial bonding, yaitu modal sosial dengan jaringan atau hubungan antar orang-orang dengan tujuan yang sama (Ruseva et al, 2016).…”
Section: Jaringan Sosial Dalam Pengelolaan Mata Airunclassified
“…This study sheds new light on https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss2/art3/ the social dimensions of biological invasions, and it takes an important step toward a better understanding of the informal institutions governing invasive species management. Ruseva et al (2016) focused on examining norms and values, cooperation, and communication among land trust board members in the southern Appalachian region of the eastern USA. More often studied among individual landowners, these indicators of social capital provide insights into the conditions that enable or promote PLC among land conservation organizations.…”
Section: Social-psychological Links With Environmental Perceptions Anmentioning
confidence: 99%