Neurologic assessment

Kalser, Judith; Roulet-Perez, Eliane

doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-64148-9.00015-6

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…DDST II ini telah memenuhi persyaratan sebagai metode skrining yang baik dan menunjukkan validitas tinggi serta dapat digunakan dengan mudah dan cepat (15-20 menit) (Jasri & Karim, 2020). Kalser & Roulet-Perez (2020). mengatakan DDST II dapat digunakan untuk menguji anak-anak dibidang perkembangan motorik kasar dan halus, keterampilan bahasa, dan keterampilan pribadi-sosial.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Pelatihan Skrining Perkembangan Anak Pada Guru Dan Wali Murid Dengan Denver Developmental Screening Test Ii (Ddst Ii)

Rehana

Jawiah

Amin

et al. 2022

JPMB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perkembangan sangat penting dalam kehidupan manusia khususnya bagi anak. Berdasarkan data BPS menunjukkan bahwa 30,1% penduduk indonesia adalah anak-anak, untuk itu perlu memberikan perhatian khusus pada anak-anak dalam menilai perkembangannya. Pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk pemberdayaan guru dan wali murid mengenai cara penilaian perkembangan anak, pengukuran tingkat perkembangan anak usia dini dan meningkatkan kapasitas guru dan wali murid, sehingga mempunyai keterampilan dalam melakukan skrining terhadap perkembangan anak dengan menggunakan Denver Developmental Screening Test II (DDST II). Mitra dalam pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini adalah guru dan wali murid. Metode pada pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini yaitu penyegaran tumbuh kembang anak dan stimulasinya, pemberian pelatihan skrining perkembangan anak dengan form DDST II dan pendampingan pelaksanaan skrining. Hasil yang didapat setiap kelompok memiliki kemampuan dalam skrining perkembangan anak. Dengan adanya pelatihan skrining dengan menggunakan DDST II ini, guru dan wali murid dapat memantau perkembangan anak, sehingga bila terdapat kelainan dapat terdeteksi secara dini.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Pelatihan Skrining Perkembangan Anak Pada Guru Dan Wali Murid Dengan Denver Developmental Screening Test Ii (Ddst Ii)

Rehana

Jawiah

Amin

et al. 2022

JPMB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Assessment of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) is widely recognised as a fundamental tenet of the modern neurological examination for all critically ill patients 1 2. This simple non-invasive assessment can detect neurological deterioration, retinal axonal loss and autonomic dysfunction in critically ill patients but suffers from poor inter-rater reliability when assessed by clinicians 3 4.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospective study examining the impact of cerebral angiography on quantitative pupillometer values in the interventional radiology suite

Nguyen,

Marshall,

Rana

et al. 2024

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe purpose of this pilot study was to obtain baseline quantitative pupillometry (QP) measurements before and after catheter-directed cerebral angiography (DCA) to explore the hypothesis that cerebral angiography is an independent predictor of change in pupillary light reflex (PLR) metrics.DesignThis was a prospective, observational pilot study of PLR assessments obtained using QP 30 min before and after DCA. All patients had QP measurements performed with the NPi-300 (Neuroptics) pupillometer.SettingRecruitment was done at a single-centre, tertiary-care academic hospital and comprehensive stroke centre in Dallas, Texas.ParticipantsFifty participants were recruited undergoing elective or emergent angiography. Inclusion criteria were a physician-ordered interventional neuroradiological procedure, at least 18 years of age, no contraindications to PLR assessment with QP, and nursing transport to and from DCA. Patients with a history of eye surgery were excluded.Main outcome measuresDifference in PLR metric obtained from QP 30 min before and after DCA.ResultsStatistically significant difference was noted in the pre and post left eye readings for the minimum pupil size (a.k.a., pupil diameter on maximum constriction). The mean maximum constriction diameter prior to angiogram of 3.2 (1.1) mm was statistically larger than after angiogram (2.9 (1.0) mm; p<0.05); however, this was not considered clinically significant. Comparisons for all other PLR metrics pre and post angiogram demonstrated no significant difference. Using change in NPi pre and post angiogram (Δpre=0.05 (0.77) vs Δpost=0.08 (0.67); p=0.62), we calculated the effect size as 0.042. Hence, detecting a statistically significant difference in NPi, if a difference exists, would require a sample size of ~6000 patients.ConclusionsOur study provides supportive data that in an uncomplicated angiogram, even with intervention, there is no effect on the PLR.

show abstract

Neurologic assessment

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Pelatihan Skrining Perkembangan Anak Pada Guru Dan Wali Murid Dengan Denver Developmental Screening Test Ii (Ddst Ii)

Pelatihan Skrining Perkembangan Anak Pada Guru Dan Wali Murid Dengan Denver Developmental Screening Test Ii (Ddst Ii)

Prospective study examining the impact of cerebral angiography on quantitative pupillometer values in the interventional radiology suite

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About