2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-011-0048-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuromuscular adaptations with flexible fixed functional appliance – a 2-year follow-up study

Abstract: The anterior temporalis and masseter muscles clearly responded to appliance therapy. The neuromuscular adaptation documented after 6 months of treatment remained stable over a 24-month observation period.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This decrease was probably related to remission of pain symptoms caused by dental compression during sleep, subluxation of the mandibular condyles, headaches, cervical pain and osteoarthrosis [14], and was likely due to posture changes during use of the apparatus leading to clinical improvement. Bone discrepancy remodeling and articular positioning after 12 months of functional orthopedics appliance use reestablished the functionality of the masticatory muscles [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This decrease was probably related to remission of pain symptoms caused by dental compression during sleep, subluxation of the mandibular condyles, headaches, cervical pain and osteoarthrosis [14], and was likely due to posture changes during use of the apparatus leading to clinical improvement. Bone discrepancy remodeling and articular positioning after 12 months of functional orthopedics appliance use reestablished the functionality of the masticatory muscles [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This is a usual active retention alternative employed after using a fixed functional appliance. 10 , 32 Because use of the MPA appliance was of 9 months and treatment times were relatively long in both groups, the additional time with Class II elastics use as active retention should, most likely, assure good stability of the anteroposterior correction. 10 , 23 Nevertheless, this issue should be investigated in future studies.…”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Con estos hallazgos se demuestra que los pacientes no presentan dificultad en adaptarse a la nueva posición mandibular después de 6 meses de tratamiento activo. Sin embargo, es importante aclarar que no todos los estudios presentan uniformidad en cuanto al diseño vertical de los aparatos empleados y por tanto se pueden encontrar aumentos y disminuciones de las actividades electromiográficas [34].…”
Section: Efectos De La Estimulación De Crecimiento Mandibular a Nivelunclassified
“…Es un aparato más flexible y elástico que el Herbst, en el que la mandíbula puede realizar fácilmente movimientos laterales; los pacientes pueden cerrar en relación céntrica, morder repetidamente y deglutir, resultando en una mandí-bula más estable [34]. La inserción del Forsus crea una reprogramación motora resultando en una adaptación postural que permite la respuesta de crecimiento [34].…”
Section: Figura 10 Vista Lateral Del Forsusunclassified