2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/374/1/012098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Device for Endoscopic Vacuum-Assisted Closure (E-Vac) in Acute Mediastinitis from Esophageal Perforation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical studies have demonstrated that different surgical approaches for perforated duodenal ulcers have significant differences regarding recovery, complications, and mortality rates [13][14][15][16]. Upon comparison between conventional approaches (open abdominal) versus minimally invasive (laparoscopic) and between the varying procedures (omental patch, suturing, and E-VAC), our case report demonstrates that the E-VAC system is the option with the best prognosis and lowest mortality rate [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Without the use of the E-VAC system, this patient with an ASA score of IV did not have a favorable prognosis, having a high risk of postoperative mortality [3,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Statistical studies have demonstrated that different surgical approaches for perforated duodenal ulcers have significant differences regarding recovery, complications, and mortality rates [13][14][15][16]. Upon comparison between conventional approaches (open abdominal) versus minimally invasive (laparoscopic) and between the varying procedures (omental patch, suturing, and E-VAC), our case report demonstrates that the E-VAC system is the option with the best prognosis and lowest mortality rate [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Without the use of the E-VAC system, this patient with an ASA score of IV did not have a favorable prognosis, having a high risk of postoperative mortality [3,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Upon comparison between conventional approaches (open abdominal) versus minimally invasive (laparoscopic) and between the varying procedures (omental patch, suturing, and E-VAC), our case report demonstrates that the E-VAC system is the option with the best prognosis and lowest mortality rate [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Without the use of the E-VAC system, this patient with an ASA score of IV did not have a favorable prognosis, having a high risk of postoperative mortality [3,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Not only was the patient able to recover, but the patient was able to do so without any complications and with rapid recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation