2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New global forest/non-forest maps from ALOS PALSAR data (2007–2010)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
376
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 535 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
376
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison with alternative space-borne remotely sensed data indicated that AGB models using TanDEM-X WorldDEM data had a larger predictive accuracy than other models using either RapidEye, global Landsat maps [34], or global PALSAR maps [35] for which Naesset et al [29] reported RMSE values of 32.2 t·ha −1 (62.7%), 43.6 t·ha −1 (85.0%) and 45.3 t·ha −1 (88.3%), respectively. Consistent with studies conducted in similar forest types, the present one reported effects of saturation for field plots with AGB >186 t·ha −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison with alternative space-borne remotely sensed data indicated that AGB models using TanDEM-X WorldDEM data had a larger predictive accuracy than other models using either RapidEye, global Landsat maps [34], or global PALSAR maps [35] for which Naesset et al [29] reported RMSE values of 32.2 t·ha −1 (62.7%), 43.6 t·ha −1 (85.0%) and 45.3 t·ha −1 (88.3%), respectively. Consistent with studies conducted in similar forest types, the present one reported effects of saturation for field plots with AGB >186 t·ha −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, SAR data are an ideal complement to optical-based forest monitoring systems [30][31][32]. In particular, multi-temporal L-band SAR data from ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite) PALSAR (Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar) have been proven to be capable of detecting tropical deforestation [33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other multi-temporal products, such as the ALOS PALSAR Forest/Non-Forest data available from 2007 to 2010 [34], were also found to be less effective for detecting small harvests. As an example, we show a map of the Forest/Non-Forest data for the years 2009 and 2010 ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We combine stand level ground-truth data on harvests with the satellite images, to calculate the rate and intensity of harvests on a yearly basis. We validate these results with harvests outside of the FCC, and compare our results to the Landsat-based Global Forest Watch [30] and the ALOS PALSAR Forest/Non-Forest databases [34]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 75%