2016
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-315116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New ideas on the ALS Functional Rating Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, nine patients fulfilled the criteria for definite ALS, 19 patients met the criteria for probable ALS, and none of them fulfilled the requirements for possible ALS. They were scored using the revised ALS Functional Rating scale (ALSFRS-R) which denotes 12 items (each of 5 scores from 0 to 4) [14]. Key muscles from the upper and lower extremities were evaluated using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, nine patients fulfilled the criteria for definite ALS, 19 patients met the criteria for probable ALS, and none of them fulfilled the requirements for possible ALS. They were scored using the revised ALS Functional Rating scale (ALSFRS-R) which denotes 12 items (each of 5 scores from 0 to 4) [14]. Key muscles from the upper and lower extremities were evaluated using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%