2018
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000012997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New methods for specialized subjective and high-precision objective evaluation of constricted ears

Abstract: The effects of therapy on constricted ears are evaluated subjectively and objectively. However, previous methods are not specific, comprehensive, precise, or effective in diagnosing and predicting surgical outcomes. This study aimed to present a personalized, subjective evaluation scale and new objective indices utilizing a digital method for the accurate evaluation of constricted ears.Nine consecutive patients with constricted ears were selected. To perform subjective evaluations, the patients’ parents were c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, CH and CA are the key indices in diagnosing microtia (20). The ALA is becoming a very promising index in the diagnosis of constricted ear and other abnormalities which are associated with substantial helix changes (29). Therefore, in the present study, a total of five parameters were measured, which contain almost all the necessary data for the diagnosis, pre-operation design and outcome evaluation of a variety of auricular abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, CH and CA are the key indices in diagnosing microtia (20). The ALA is becoming a very promising index in the diagnosis of constricted ear and other abnormalities which are associated with substantial helix changes (29). Therefore, in the present study, a total of five parameters were measured, which contain almost all the necessary data for the diagnosis, pre-operation design and outcome evaluation of a variety of auricular abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%