New State Record for the Asian Tiger Mosquito, Aedes Albopictus (Skuse)

Bennett, Janine K.; Hickman, Angel D.; A., Kline, Michael; McGINNIS, Michael W.; Weissmann, M. J.

doi:10.2987/8756-971x(2006)21[341:nsrfta]2.0.co;2

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It also predicts some suitable habitat for Ae. albopictus in Colorado; one report supports this prediction [40]. In Brazil, the SDM correctly predicts suitable habitat in the state of Ceará from which Ae.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 80%

A Global Airport-Based Risk Model for the Spread of Dengue Infection via the Air Transport Network

Gardner

Sarkar

2013

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of travel-acquired dengue infections has seen a consistent global rise over the past decade. An increased volume of international passenger air traffic originating from regions with endemic dengue has contributed to a rise in the number of dengue cases in both areas of endemicity and elsewhere. This paper reports results from a network-based risk assessment model which uses international passenger travel volumes, travel routes, travel distances, regional populations, and predictive species distribution models (for the two vector species, Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus) to quantify the relative risk posed by each airport in importing passengers with travel-acquired dengue infections. Two risk attributes are evaluated: (i) the risk posed by through traffic at each stopover airport and (ii) the risk posed by incoming travelers to each destination airport. The model results prioritize optimal locations (i.e., airports) for targeted dengue surveillance. The model is easily extendible to other vector-borne diseases.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 80%

A Global Airport-Based Risk Model for the Spread of Dengue Infection via the Air Transport Network

Gardner

Sarkar

2013

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…populations of that species. For example, extreme outliers to the north (e.g., Minnesota) or in the central, intermountain west (e.g., Colorado) for both species are commonly associated with repeated introductions to tire facilities (Reiter 1998, Bennett et al 2005, Neitzel et al 2009. Finally, based on differences in the intensity and spatial coverage of the surveillance effort and the collection methods used, our maps showing collection records of Ae.…”

Section: Number Of Years With At Least One Mosquito Reportedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reported Distribution of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus in the United States, 1995-2016 (Diptera: Culicidae)

Hahn

Eisen

et al. 2016

Journal of Medical Entomology

109

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.) and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse) transmit arboviruses that are increasing threats to human health in the Americas, particularly dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses. Epidemics of the associated arboviral diseases have been limited to South and Central America, Mexico, and the Caribbean in the Western Hemisphere, with only minor localized outbreaks in the United States. Nevertheless, accurate and up-to-date information for the geographical ranges of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus in the United States is urgently needed to guide surveillance and enhance control capacity for these mosquitoes. We compiled county records for presence of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus in the United States from 1995-2016, presented here in map format. Records were derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ArboNET database, VectorMap, the published literature, and a survey of mosquito control agencies, university researchers, and state and local health departments. Between January 1995 and March 2016, 183 counties from 26 states and the District of Columbia reported occurrence of Ae. aegypti, and 1,241 counties from 40 states and the District of Columbia reported occurrence of Ae. albopictus During the same time period, Ae. aegypti was collected in 3 or more years from 94 counties from 14 states and the District of Columbia, and Ae. albopictus was collected during 3 or more years from 514 counties in 34 states and the District of Columbia. Our findings underscore the need for systematic surveillance of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus in the United States and delineate areas with risk for the transmission of these introduced arboviruses.

show abstract

“…All recorded occurrences of A. albopictus were compiled from the literature (Rossi et al, 1999;Schaffner & Karch, 2000;Chadee et al, 2003;Bennett et al, 2005;Aranda et al, 2006;Klobučar et al, 2006;Benedict et al, 2007;Krueger & Hagen, 2007). Occurrences were represented as points (latitude and longitude), except in the US where data were county-level.…”

Section: Species Occurrence Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Niche shifts during the global invasion of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus Skuse (Culicidae), revealed by reciprocal distribution models

Medley

2009

Global Ecology and Biogeography

304

357

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim Niche-based distribution models are often used to predict the spread of invasive species. These models assume niche conservation during invasion, but invasive species can have different requirements from populations in their native range for many reasons, including niche evolution. I used distribution modelling to investigate niche conservatism for the Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus Skuse) during its invasion of three continents. I also used this approach to predict areas at risk of invasion from propagules originating from invasive populations.Location Models were created for Southeast Asia, North and South America, and Europe.Methods I used maximum entropy (Maxent) to create distribution models using occurrence data and 18 environmental datasets. One native model was created for Southeast Asia; this model was projected onto North America, South America and Europe. Three models were created independently for the non-native ranges and projected onto the native range. Niche overlap between native and non-native predictions was evaluated by comparing probability surfaces between models using real data and random models generated using a permutation approach. ResultsThe native model failed to predict an entire region of occurrences in South America, approximately 20% of occurrences in North America and nearly all Italian occurrences of A. albopictus. Non-native models poorly predict the native range, but predict additional areas at risk for invasion globally. Niche overlap metrics indicate that non-native distributions are more similar to the native niche than a random prediction, but they are not equivalent. Multivariate analyses support modelled differences in niche characteristics among continents, and reveal important variables explaining these differences. Main conclusionsThe niche of A. albopictus has shifted on invaded continents relative to its native range (Southeast Asia). Statistical comparisons reveal that the niche for introduced distributions is not equivalent to the native niche. Furthermore, reciprocal models highlight the importance of controlling bi-directional dispersal between native and non-native distributions.

show abstract

New State Record for the Asian Tiger Mosquito, Aedes Albopictus (Skuse)

Cited by 5 publications

References 4 publications

A Global Airport-Based Risk Model for the Spread of Dengue Infection via the Air Transport Network

A Global Airport-Based Risk Model for the Spread of Dengue Infection via the Air Transport Network

Reported Distribution of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus in the United States, 1995-2016 (Diptera: Culicidae)

Niche shifts during the global invasion of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus Skuse (Culicidae), revealed by reciprocal distribution models

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About