New Technologies as a Neglected Social Movement Outcome: The Case of Activism against Animal Experimentation

Abstract

Recently, scholars have focused on a growing number of social movement consequences. However, one important type of intended outcome has been neglected: the development of new technologies. Connecting to key insights from Science and Technology Studies, the aim of this article is to contribute to the literature on the effects of activism in two specific ways. First, I present and discuss four causal mechanisms that show how activists trigger the development of new technologies. Second, I demonstrate how the development of new technologies is a highly contested goal among activists, leading to divisions within social movements. Based on novel empirical research, this paper analyzes a crucial and understudied case of a movement pushing for new technologies: the animal rights movement and its efforts to push for alternatives to animal experimentation. Methodologically, I rely on semistructured interviews with activists from different social movement organizations, publications of social movement organizations, and secondary literature.

A Model of Sustainable Consumer Behaviour, Personal Development, and Attitudes Toward Marketing

“…In a business context, consumer social activism contributes to corporate social responsibility and innovation (King, 2008;Subramanian, 2017;van Wijk, et al, 2019). It also contributes to new technology development (Weisskircher, 2019). Social activism is linked to career competence (Kumar and Babu, 2015) and more productive use of social media (Hirsch, 2014;Treré, 2015).…”

Politik auf der Straße? Zum Forschungsstand zu sozialen Bewegungen, Protest und Zivilgesellschaft

“…Seitdem betonte die Forschung eine Vielzahl an Effekten, auch jenseits der Gesetzgebung, z. B. Änderungen der öffentlichen Meinung (Banaszak und Ondercin 2016 ) und breiter kultureller Wandel (Amenta und Polelletta 2019 ), die Etablierung neuer Parteien (Kitschelt 1989 ), Einfluss auf Unternehmenspolitik und sogar auf Profite und Aktienkurse (Soule 2018 ), die Entwicklung neuer Technologien (Weisskircher 2019 ) oder gar Revolutionen und Regimewechsel (Goodwin 2001 ). Darüber hinaus hat Aktivismus auch Auswirkungen auf die AktivistInnen selbst, d. h. auf ihre politischen – und privaten – Biografien (McAdam 1988 ).…”

The European Citizens’ Initiative: Mobilization Strategies and Consequences

“…Stop Vivisection mobilized successfully not only despite its focus on an issue of low public salience, but also despite intra-movement divisions and a lack of funding. Many of the animal rights movements’ biggest organizations abstained from supporting the campaign, reflecting broader divisions within the movement (Weisskircher, 2019). Examples are the British RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals), an organization with annual revenue of about £130 million and the central player within the Brussels-based umbrella organization Eurogroup for Animals.…”