Newspaper Coverage and Framing of Bats, and Their Impact on Readership Engagement

Abstract

The media is a valuable pathway for transforming people’s attitudes towards conservation issues. Understanding how bats are framed in the media is hence essential for bat conservation, particularly considering the recent fearmongering and misinformation about the risks posed by bats. We reviewed bat-related articles published online no later than 2019 (before the recent COVID19 pandemic), in 15 newspapers from the five most populated countries in Western Europe. We examined the extent to which bats were presented as a threat to human health and the assumed general attitudes towards bats that such articles supported. We quantified press coverage on bat conservation values and evaluated whether the country and political stance had any information bias. Finally, we assessed their terminology and, for the first time, modelled the active response from the readership based on the number of online comments. Out of 1095 articles sampled, 17% focused on bats and diseases, 53% on a range of ecological and conservation topics, and 30% only mention bats anecdotally. While most of the ecological articles did not present bats as a threat (97%), most articles focusing on diseases did so (80%). Ecosystem services were mentioned on very few occasions in both types (< 30%), and references to the economic benefits they provide were meagre (< 4%). Disease-related concepts were recurrent, and those articles that framed bats as a threat were the ones that garnered the highest number of comments. Therefore, we encourage the media to play a more proactive role in reinforcing positive conservation messaging by presenting the myriad ways in which bats contribute to safeguarding human well-being and ecosystem functioning. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10393-023-01634-x.

Robust evidence for bats as reservoir hosts is lacking in most African virus studies: a review and call to optimize sampling and conserve bats

“…Disease-related speculation not supported by strong evidence but shaped by bat-virus catchphrases lacking scientific integrity undermines decades of conservation efforts [208]. Careful, scientifically correct wording is crucial for how results are disseminated to and by the press [209,210], informing the press and the public about the relation of bats and viruses based on scientific information content, while considering the challenges of contextualizing scientific findings from a non-expert audience perspective. Fortunately, efforts aimed at mitigating bathuman interactions can successfully balance bat conservation and human health [159].…”