2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.06.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of non-cirrhotic splanchnic vein thrombosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though Carrà’s data mirror those recently published by Magaz et al in 74 patients with idiopathic SVT, 2 the reported results have different points of interest. The first is that the authors, after setting the variant allele frequency threshold as >2%, reported a CHIP prevalence of 46% (95% confidence interval: 21%-73%), which is the highest ever reported.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Even though Carrà’s data mirror those recently published by Magaz et al in 74 patients with idiopathic SVT, 2 the reported results have different points of interest. The first is that the authors, after setting the variant allele frequency threshold as >2%, reported a CHIP prevalence of 46% (95% confidence interval: 21%-73%), which is the highest ever reported.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…The development of computers has made it possible to analyze high-throughput data generated with this approach [ 24 ]. The application of bioinformatics has enriched the diversity of disease research and analysis methods [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation of the allelic burden with more sensitive techniques such as digital PCR provides more information in this regard. Moreover, investigation of additional somatic variants in JAK2 , in other myeloproliferative associated genes such as MPL or in genes involved in the age and clonal hematopoiesis that have been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, particularly in DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1, could have provided more valuable data [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%