2018
DOI: 10.1108/mf-12-2016-0371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nexus between risk sharing vs non-risk sharing financing and economic growth of Bangladesh

Abstract: and finally, Quoc Cuong Phan and Taha Bhatti for the excellent research assistance in managing some of the papers in this issue. 646 MF 44,6 regarding the effect of these two variables to risk exposure and efficacy of both Islamic and conventional banking systems. In order to add more value to current literature with reference to the differences between Islamic and conventional banking systems, Bougatef and Korbi aimed to study the factors that explain intermediation margins under both Islamic and conventional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 235 publications
(355 reference statements)
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first approach of studying the phenomenon of Islamic finance and economic growth is based on the 'Schumpeterian supply-leading' approach. Chowdhury et al (2018) and Abd. Majid and Kassim (2015) suggested a positive and linear relationship between Islamic banking and economic growth in a Malaysian economic setting.…”
Section: Islamic Financial Sector and Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first approach of studying the phenomenon of Islamic finance and economic growth is based on the 'Schumpeterian supply-leading' approach. Chowdhury et al (2018) and Abd. Majid and Kassim (2015) suggested a positive and linear relationship between Islamic banking and economic growth in a Malaysian economic setting.…”
Section: Islamic Financial Sector and Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in favor of Islamic finance and economic growth have been conducted in different countries around the globe. For instance, Jouini (2016) endorsed this relationship in Saudi Arabia, Abduh and Omar (2012), Anwar et al (2020) in Indonesia, Kassim (2016) in Malaysia, Chowdhury et al (2018) in Bangladesh, Goaied and Sassi (2010) in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, Lebdaoui and Wild (2016) Southeast Asia, and Abedifar et al (2016) in 22 Muslim countries. Nevertheless, the findings become inconclusive when other authors explored the insignificance of the relationship between Islamic finance and economic growth in UAE, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Turkey, and MENA countries (Adnan Hye and Islam 2013;Hachicha and Amar 2015;Kar et al 2011;Yüksel and Canöz 2017;Zarrouk et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes contributing to financing morally acceptable projects, encouraging lending, promoting financial stability and stimulating saving (Imam and Kpodar, 2016). It is supported by Islamic banking-sharing instruments, which are predominantly equity-based and directly pursue the bi-directional causal relationship with economic growth (Chowdhury et al, 2018;Kassim, 2016). Islamic banks promote economic activities, including offering capital ventures in the real economy, which is more efficient compared to pure lending.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies, Islamic banks have positive impacts on economic growth. For instance, it has an economic contribution through the transmission of deposit to financing and investment in Bangladesh (Chowdhury et al, 2018), GCC and East Asia countries (Grassa and Gazdar, 2014;Mohd. Yusof and Bahlous, 2013), Indonesia (Abduh and Omar, 2012), Malaysia (Abd.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this time, capital structure theory is used, such as packing order theory (Modigliani & Miller, 1963), pecking order theory (pecking order theory) in the analysis of capital structure developed by (Myers, 1984). The capital structure of the Islamic banks are broadly divided into two types, namely based financing income (profit and musharaka) and financing of non-PLS (murabaha, salam, istishna, and ijarah) (Chowdhury, Akbar, & Shoyeb, 2018;Wahyudi et al 2019). The principles of non-PLS in Islamic banking allows the expansion of the , muajjal, Istishna', Ijarah, and Murabaha (Chowdhury et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%