2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NGTS clusters survey – III. A low-mass eclipsing binary in the Blanco 1 open cluster spanning the fully convective boundary

Abstract: We present the discovery and characterisation of an eclipsing binary identified by the Next Generation Transit Survey in the ∼115 Myr old Blanco 1 open cluster. NGTS J0002-29 comprises three M dwarfs: a short-period binary and a companion in a wider orbit. This system is the first well-characterised, low-mass eclipsing binary in Blanco 1. With a low mass ratio, a tertiary companion and binary components that straddle the fully convective boundary, it is an important benchmark system, and one of only two well-c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case of NGTS 0002-29 is also remarkable. The system is a member of the Blanco 1 open cluster [37] with and estimated age of 90 − 150 Ma. Comparing with the BHAC15 models at this age range, radius discrepancies are reduced to ∼5.5% and ∼3.2% for components A and B, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of NGTS 0002-29 is also remarkable. The system is a member of the Blanco 1 open cluster [37] with and estimated age of 90 − 150 Ma. Comparing with the BHAC15 models at this age range, radius discrepancies are reduced to ∼5.5% and ∼3.2% for components A and B, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to SW21, we compiled a comparison sample of precisely measured low mass stars from literature, classified in single stars, double lined binaries, and single lined binaries. (Carter et al 2011;Nefs et al 2013;Gillen et al 2017;Parsons et al 2018;Smith et al 2021;Swayne et al 2021). We compared the radii with both the MIST and the Exeter/Lyon (Baraffe et al 2015) models for solar metallicity.…”
Section: Mass-radius Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%