2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2gc35970g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nitrate removal from liquid effluents using microalgae immobilized on chitosan nanofiber mats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the related study was performed by our group in which Acinetobacter calcoaceticus STB1 cells were immobilized on electrospun cellulose acetate nanobrous webs (CA-NFW) in order to achieve enhanced ammonium removal in aqueous environments. 26 Moreover, Eroglu et al 23 have shown in their study that, algal cells were effectively immobilized on electrospun chitosan nanober mats to generate a hybrid system for nitrate removal. In our recent study, decolorization of methylene blue (MB) dye in aqueous medium was achieved by using three types of bacteria (Aeromonas eucrenophila, Clavibacter michiganensis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) that were immobilized on the CA-NFW within 24 hours and the MB dye removal efficiency was $95%.…”
Section: -22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the related study was performed by our group in which Acinetobacter calcoaceticus STB1 cells were immobilized on electrospun cellulose acetate nanobrous webs (CA-NFW) in order to achieve enhanced ammonium removal in aqueous environments. 26 Moreover, Eroglu et al 23 have shown in their study that, algal cells were effectively immobilized on electrospun chitosan nanober mats to generate a hybrid system for nitrate removal. In our recent study, decolorization of methylene blue (MB) dye in aqueous medium was achieved by using three types of bacteria (Aeromonas eucrenophila, Clavibacter michiganensis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) that were immobilized on the CA-NFW within 24 hours and the MB dye removal efficiency was $95%.…”
Section: -22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past years, several magnetic particles have been employed for the separation or entrapment of microalgae. These materials include uncoated iron oxides (Bitton et al 1975;Xu et al 2011;Prochazkova et al 2013), surface functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles with cationic polyacrylamides (Wang et al 2014), chitosan (Eroglu et al 2012;Lim et al 2012), polyvinylpyrrolidone (Eroglu et al 2013), and cationic polyelectrolytes (Toh et al 2014a). Among various separation methods for microalgal harvesting, magnetic separation exhibits high recovery efficiency at short operation time, and no residual magnetic nanoparticles remain in the liquid after separation (Xu et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional nanofibers containing microalgae have great potential for the environmental practices. In a study by Eroglu et al 40 algal cells were effectively immobilized on electrospun chitosan nanofiber mats for nitrate removal.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%