2016
DOI: 10.1159/000447453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Coding Loss-of-Function Variation in Human Genomes

Abstract: Whole-genome and exome sequencing in human populations has revealed the tolerance of each gene for loss-of-function variation. By understanding this tolerance, it has become increasingly possible to identify genes that would make safe therapeutic targets and to identify rare genetic risk factors and phenotypes at the scale of individual genomes. To date, the vast majority of surveyed loss-of-function variants are in protein-coding regions of the genome mainly due to the focus on these regions by exome-based se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The curation process showed that current sets of high confidence large-effect pathogenic noncoding SNVs associated to monogenic Mendelian diseases are mostly constituted of proximal cis-regulatory variants associated to the closest protein-coding gene, in line with previous reports 19 . Such distribution most probably reflects a historical ascertainment bias towards such regions in previously described Mendelian genes, which is expected to be steadily overcome by unbiased WGS approaches 5 . However, in the time being, the current status posses limits to the supervised learning and benchmark on distal cis-and trans-acting pathogenic regulatory variants with clinical implications in Mendelian diseases, and warns about the applicability of our approach and reference methods in such scope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The curation process showed that current sets of high confidence large-effect pathogenic noncoding SNVs associated to monogenic Mendelian diseases are mostly constituted of proximal cis-regulatory variants associated to the closest protein-coding gene, in line with previous reports 19 . Such distribution most probably reflects a historical ascertainment bias towards such regions in previously described Mendelian genes, which is expected to be steadily overcome by unbiased WGS approaches 5 . However, in the time being, the current status posses limits to the supervised learning and benchmark on distal cis-and trans-acting pathogenic regulatory variants with clinical implications in Mendelian diseases, and warns about the applicability of our approach and reference methods in such scope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, every year approximately 300 new Mendelian diseases are described, whereas the pace for discovery of the causal molecular mechanisms fluctuates at around 200 yearly 3 . Despite the progress achieved through Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)-based studies, recent reviews show highly heterogeneous diagnostic rates across disease types 4,5 , ranging from <15% (e.g. congenital diaphragmatic hernia or syndromic congenital heart disease) to >70% (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We acknowledge that noncoding or intergenic regions were not considered in the later steps of assessment of potential causal mutations. Although different studies have shown that noncoding variants may directly affect gene expression and protein abundance (Zappala and Montgomery, 2016;Igartua et al, 2017), and therefore represent impactful variation, we considered that focusing on the coding region was an appropriate initial approach to evaluate the high density variability study performed on this work. Among the genes harboring the potential functional relevant variants, we highlighted those related to immunity based on our reference candidate gene list (Supplemental Table S10, https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2018 -14736; a total of 85 variants highlighted in yellow).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for considered sub-analyses of the other approaches (targeted and WES) in silico, in addition to analysis of the non-coding regions. With developing bioinformatics tools and approaches, interrogating non-coding regions of the genome and transcriptome is becoming increasingly possible and is beginning to show a vast amount of small-and large-scale variation that could hold the key to unknown and unsolved disease (reviewed in [9][10][11] ).…”
Section: Basic Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%