2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Non-filling” procedures for lip augmentation: A systematic review of contemporary techniques and their outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed an overall average improvement in the NLA, presenting with 10.9% width reduction and 23.5% lip length shortening assessed 1 year after the surgical procedure (►Figs. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results showed an overall average improvement in the NLA, presenting with 10.9% width reduction and 23.5% lip length shortening assessed 1 year after the surgical procedure (►Figs. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Even though the aged upper lip is often neglected by both the facial surgeon and the patient, upper lip-lifting has already been described in the early 1980s as a stand-alone procedure or along with other face-lifting procedures for full face rejuvenation performed both directly at the vermilion border and indirectly through a subnasal or endonasal approach. [4][5][6][7][8] Lips should therefore not be considered as a single anatomical entity, but indeed they must be placed in a strong correlation with the nose, which is the closest and most related anatomical and aesthetic structure of the face.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another technique in this group is indirect lip lifting in which a sub-nasal incision is made and the vermilion border of the upper lip is indirectly lifted by excising the horn-shaped under nose skin. 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the interesting advantage of non-filing techniques is their permanency, but they carry a practical limitation. 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation