2018
DOI: 10.1109/lpt.2018.2823502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Line-of-Sight Ultraviolet Communication With Receiver Diversity in Atmospheric Turbulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The channel impulse response for the LOS link can be represented as a matrix H ch = [h ch,u,v ] U×V , where U and V are the numbers of rows and columns of the image sensor, respectively and h ch,u,v is the channel impulse response of the (u, v)-th pixel. Using a single LED and a Gaussian mixture model, h ch,u,v is estimated as [6]:…”
Section: Channel Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The channel impulse response for the LOS link can be represented as a matrix H ch = [h ch,u,v ] U×V , where U and V are the numbers of rows and columns of the image sensor, respectively and h ch,u,v is the channel impulse response of the (u, v)-th pixel. Using a single LED and a Gaussian mixture model, h ch,u,v is estimated as [6]:…”
Section: Channel Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OWC covers the entire optical spectrum of ultraviolet (UV), visible and infrared (IR) [1,2], see Figure 1, thus offering a massive theoretical bandwidth of 20 THz (IR), 320 THz (visible) and 30 PHz (UV) compared with the bandwidth of 300 GHz in the RF technology [1,3,4]. Within the OWC umbrella, there are a number of transmission schemes for both indoor and outdoor environments including infrared communications (IRC), free space optics (FSO), visible light communications (VLC) and ultraviolet communications (UVC) [1,[3][4][5][6], as shown in Figure 2. The VLC and IRC are generally considered for short-range indoor applications, while FSO (using the IR band) and UVC (using the C band) are predominantly employed for medium-long range outdoor environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial diversity techniques provide an appealing alternative approach for fading compensation with their inherent redundancy, which has been extensively studied in the context of RF and IR wireless networks [17, 18]. The number of articles that addressed the deployment of spatial diversity in NLOS‐UV communication systems is somewhat limited [13, 14, 19–27]. El‐Shimy and Hranilovic investigated spatial diversity imaging receivers for NLOS‐UV links with consideration of path loss and delay spread.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…conducted the experimental research on 1×4 real‐time SIMO diversity reception for NLOS‐UV links [20]. Arya and Chung have proposed the spatial diversity reception of NLOS‐UV communication in turbulent atmospheric channels [21]. They considered receive diversity over correlated Gamma‐Gamma distributed channels and investigated the outage probability and the symbol error rate of single‐input‐multiple‐output (SIMO) systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OWC relies on light intensity to convey data, with frequencies ranging from ultraviolet (UV) to visible light to infrared. Compared to radio frequency communication links, OWC offers a secure connection with a wide free spectrum range, high spectral efficiency, low-power operation, and miniaturized transceiver circuits [1], [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%