2010
DOI: 10.1155/2010/291043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-linear Vibrations of Deep Cylindrical Shells by thep-Version Finite Element Method

Abstract: Abstract.A p-version shell finite element based on the so-called shallow shell theory is for the first time employed to study vibrations of deep cylindrical shells. The finite element formulation for deep shells is presented and the linear natural frequencies of different shells, with various boundary conditions, are computed. These linear natural frequencies are compared with published results and with results obtained using a commercial software finite element package; good agreement is found. External force… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[167] a shooting method in conjunction with the Newton method was utilized to solve the equations of motion and to obtain the non linear frequency response curves. Similar finite element formulations were presented by Ribeiro et al [168] to study non linear vibrations of deep cylindrical panels.…”
Section: Cylindrical and Doubly Curved Panelsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…[167] a shooting method in conjunction with the Newton method was utilized to solve the equations of motion and to obtain the non linear frequency response curves. Similar finite element formulations were presented by Ribeiro et al [168] to study non linear vibrations of deep cylindrical panels.…”
Section: Cylindrical and Doubly Curved Panelsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Generally, the p-version FEM is superior to the traditional h-version FEM. The application of the p-version FEM in three dimensions, including in three -dimensional linear elastic fracture analysis, can be found in [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: P-version Finite Element Methods and Contour Integral Methods In Three Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not a large value and, according to Leissa and Narita (1984), Singh and Kumar (1996) and Qatu (2004), R ¼ 2a is the limit until which a shell can be considered to be shallow. Ribeiro et al (2010) computed the natural frequencies of a shell where R ¼ 2a using shallow shell and non-shallow shell approaches; the values provided by the two approaches were rather close. Ventsel and Krauthammer (2001) indicate more limitative values, such that @w i x, y ð Þ=@x À Á 2 is not superior to 0.05.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 98%