Non-Tariff Barriers in Selected CIS Countries

Taran, Svitlana

doi:10.2139/ssrn.1392803

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As in many other cases, non-tariff barriers seem to be more important (Taran, 2008). This is indirectly confirmed by the poor ratings on "Conducting International Trade" in the WB Doing Business 2008 survey (see Section 4 and Table 10).…”

Section: Trade Policy and Regional Integrationmentioning

confidence: 66%

Policy Challenges Faced by Low-Income CIS Economies

Dąbrowski

2008

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in CASE Network Studies & Analyses No. 375 -Policy challenges faced by low-income CIS…The CASE Network is a group of economic and social research centers in Poland, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, and Belarus. Organizations in the network regularly conduct joint research and advisory projects. The research covers a wide spectrum of economic and social issues, including economic effects of the European integration process, economic relations between the EU and CIS, monetary policy and euro-accession, innovation and competitiveness, and labour markets and social policy. The network aims to increase the range and quality of economic research and information available to policymakers and civil society, and takes an active role in on-going debates on how to meet the economic challenges facing the EU, post-transition countries and the global economy.

show abstract

Section: Trade Policy and Regional Integrationmentioning

confidence: 66%

Policy Challenges Faced by Low-Income CIS Economies

Dąbrowski

2008

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unfortunately, only a few comparative studies tried to quantify the NTB level in the FSU region and were published some time ago. For example, Taran (2008) finds a high frequency of NTBs, especially in the agriculture sector, with the over- EBRD's indicator of trade and FOREX system, 1992-2014 (on a scale of 1-4.3). Country…”

Section: External Liberalizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Thirty years of economic transition in the former Soviet Union: Microeconomic and institutional dimensions

Dąbrowski¹

2023

RUJEC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The post-communist transition in the former Soviet Union (FSU) cannot be considered entirely successful, especially in the political and institutional spheres. Nevertheless, in the economic sphere, the transition process succeeded in rebuilding the foundations of market economies based on private ownership by the early 2000s, even if the adopted policies and institutions have proved suboptimal and distortive in many countries. The transition experience in the FSU region has demonstrated a correlation between political and economic reforms, with a strong impact of the former on the latter. The deficit of democracy, civil freedoms and the rule of law has negatively impacted the course of the economic transition, causing significant delay, distortions and partial reversals.

show abstract

Türk Devletleri̇ Teşki̇latina Üye Ülkeler Arasindaki̇ Muhtemel Bi̇r Serbest Ti̇caret Anlaşmasinin Diş Ti̇caret Etki̇leri̇

Gençosmanoğlu

2024

Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı uzun süren işbirliği çalışmaları sonucunda, ekonomik ve ticari entegrasyonun geliştirilmesi konusunu da içeren yeni vizyonunu belirlemiştir. Bu çerçevede, bir entegrasyon modeli olarak, tarife ve tarife-dışı önlemlerin kaldırıldığı çoklu bir serbest ticaret anlaşmasının, organizasyonun tarafı olan ülkelerin dış ticareti üzerine etkileri kısmi denge analizi ve çok boyutlu panel veri modeli kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Tahmin sonuçlarına göre, serbestleşmeden tüm ülkelerin faydalanması ve ticaret hacminin yıllık yaklaşık üç milyar dolar artış göstermesi beklenmektedir. Tarife-dışı önlemlerin kaldırılması, tarifelere nazaran üye ülkeler açısından daha büyük ticari kazanç sağlamaktadır.

show abstract

Non-Tariff Barriers in Selected CIS Countries

Cited by 3 publications

References 9 publications

Policy Challenges Faced by Low-Income CIS Economies

Policy Challenges Faced by Low-Income CIS Economies

Thirty years of economic transition in the former Soviet Union: Microeconomic and institutional dimensions

Türk Devletleri̇ Teşki̇latina Üye Ülkeler Arasindaki̇ Muhtemel Bi̇r Serbest Ti̇caret Anlaşmasinin Diş Ti̇caret Etki̇leri̇

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About