2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Non-Touch” Vena Cava Technique as an Improvement in Combined Lung and Liver Procurement in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 57,58,65,67,74 ) Only 1 study adopted a predefined cutoff, whereas the others agreed in considering a downward trend a pivotal factor for organ viability. ( 57 )…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…( 57,58,65,67,74 ) Only 1 study adopted a predefined cutoff, whereas the others agreed in considering a downward trend a pivotal factor for organ viability. ( 57 )…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(57,58,65,67,74) Only 1 study adopted a predefined cutoff, whereas the others agreed in considering a downward trend a pivotal factor for organ viability. (57) Only 2 groups performed routine liver biopsy for graft selection. (64,74) recOMMenDatiOn We suggest considering any reported criteria as not definitive for graft selection during NRP.…”
Section: Is Nrp Indicated In Both Type 2 and Type 3 Dcd?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations