2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-05461-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-uptake of viral load testing among people receiving HIV treatment in Gomba district, rural Uganda

Abstract: Background Viral load (VL) testing is the gold-standard approach for monitoring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment success and virologic failure, but uptake is suboptimal in resource-limited and rural settings. We conducted a cross-sectional study of risk factors for non-uptake of VL testing in rural Uganda. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of uptake of VL testing among randomly selected people with HIV (PWH)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found lower adherence to VL testing than the 95% target [ 4 ]. However, our findings are comparable to what was reported by other studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa that showed 60% from a population based survey across Uganda [ 13 ], 33% central Uganda [ 10 ], 54% northern Uganda [ 20 ], 32% in South Africa, [ 21 ] and 60% in Mozambique [ 22 ]. However, our mixed methods study design enabled us to explore the contextual factors responsible for poor VL monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found lower adherence to VL testing than the 95% target [ 4 ]. However, our findings are comparable to what was reported by other studies conducted in sub-Saharan Africa that showed 60% from a population based survey across Uganda [ 13 ], 33% central Uganda [ 10 ], 54% northern Uganda [ 20 ], 32% in South Africa, [ 21 ] and 60% in Mozambique [ 22 ]. However, our mixed methods study design enabled us to explore the contextual factors responsible for poor VL monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There is evidence that regular VL monitoring is a cost effective [ 6 ] and is the first choice strategy for identifying poor adherence to ART and detecting treatment failure among PLHIV due to its good specificity and sensitivity [ 7 , 8 ]. However, many PLHIV on ART are still reporting to healthcare facilities with either no evidence of viral load testing or out-of-schedule results [ 9 , 10 ]. This potentially delays detection of treatment failure, identification of patients in need of more intensive adherence support, and results in unnecessary switch to expensive and limited 2 nd and 3 rd line ART regimen options [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 24 months 662/951 (69.6%) - - - Woldesenbet, S. A.; 2021 [ 29 ] 2019 6,542/8,112 (81.7%) - - - - VL testing recommended for all HIV (+) pregnant women at delivery, on ART at 1st ANC visit or 3 months after ART initiation Herce, M.E. ; 2020 [ 50 ] 6 months 269/346 (78%) - - - - IVL: % individuals with completed VL monitoring scheduled at 6- and 12-months follow-up visits 12 months 96/149 (64%) - - - Mshweshwe-Pakela, N.; 2020 [ 30 ] 6 months 455/710 (64.1%) - - - VL test done between 4 and 8 months after ART initiation Nakalega, R.; 2020 [ 47 ] 12 months 279/414 (67.4%) - - - - VL testing done at 6 months after ART initiation and 12 months thereafter at national reference Lab Opito, R.; 2020 [ 48 ] 12 months 221/422 (52.4%) - - - VL monitoring assessed by the presence of VL slip captured in medical record within 12 months of enrolment on test and treat Ya, S.S.T. ; 2020 [ 53 ] 6 months 952/1,892 (50.3%) 88/106 (83%) 23/88 (26%) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective cohort study in rural Uganda in 2017 found that 19% of 411 PWHIV with an unsuppressed VL did not receive IAC [37] while another earlier retrospective review conducted at 15 Uganda public health centers from June 2015 to December 2016 found that 7% of 449 study participants with VL above 1000 copies/ml did not have any IAC session provided [16]. This improvement in IAC linkage re ects the increased efforts by Ministry of Health in Uganda which is geared towards increased routine HIV VL testing to quickly refer for the IAC intervention all PWHIV identi ed to have unsuppressed VL [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%