Nonablative cutaneous remodeling using radiofrequency devices

Alster, Tina S.; Lupton, Jason R.

doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2007.05.005

Cited by 155 publications

(173 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

162

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Radiofrequencies (RF) treatments have been accepted as one of the most popular and promising procedures for the treatment of cellulite, skin tightening and body sculpting. TriPollar RF technology provided beneficial effects on the reduction of abdomen and thigh circumferences and an overall improvement in the appearance of cellulite [7]. Ultrasound cavitation and RF lipolysis are being from the available noninvasive methods of adipose tissue removal, these devices have been developed to remove or reduce unwanted local subcutaneous fat, and combination of these treatment modalities for fat disrupter for body contouring was used to achieve synergetic effect [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of Ultrasound Cavitation, Tripollar Radiofrequency Lipolysis and Combination Therapy on Abdominal Adiposity

Gendy¹,

Mohamed²,

Ali³

2017

IJPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Central obesity or increased intra-abdominal fat is associated with a statistically higher risk of heart disease, hypertension, insulin resistance, and diabetes mellitus type 2.Objective: This study was conducted to investigate and compare the effectiveness of tripollar radiofrequency lipolysis (RF), ultrasound (US) cavitation and their combination on abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness and waist circumference (WC) in patients with abdominal adiposity.Subjects: Thirty subjects suffering from localized fat deposits at the abdominal area with age ranged from 25-50 years old, BMI more than 30 kg/m 2 assigned randomly into three equal groups: Group (A) consisted of 10 subjects with mean age and BMI were 38.7±6.63 years and 33.55±1.31 kg/m 2 respectively. Group (B) consisted of 10 subjects with mean age and BMI were 34.3±7.76 years and 33.57±1.57kg/m 2 respectively. Group (C) consisted of 10 subjects with mean age and BMI were 34.3±7.76 years and 32.99±3.73 kg/m 2 respectively.Methods: Group (A) received US cavitation (AC 220 Volt. 40 KHz) twice weekly for 10 sessions. Group (B) received tripollar RF (AC 220 Volt .1MHZ. 50 Watts) twice weekly for 10 sessions. Group (C) received combination therapy (both tripollar RF and US cavitation) twice weekly for 10 sessions. Subjects in all groups were assessed using ultrasonography and tape measurement before treatment then after treatment after 10 sessions to measure subcutaneous fat thickness and WC.Results: Showed that there was statistical significant difference between pre and post treatment within each group (A, B and C) for abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness and WC. But there was a non-statistical significant difference between group A and group C; also, there was no statistical significant difference between group A and group B, while, there was a statistical significant difference between group B and group C in management of abdominal adiposity.Conclusion: Ultrasound cavitation, tripollar RF and their combination were effective methods for management of abdominal adiposity, but combination therapy were the most effective.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of Ultrasound Cavitation, Tripollar Radiofrequency Lipolysis and Combination Therapy on Abdominal Adiposity

Gendy¹,

Mohamed²,

Ali³

2017

IJPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One should therefore wait for this period to pass for the maximum effect (11)(12)(13)(14). RF energy especially decreases mild to moderate skin laxity but does not affect epidermal melanin as it is not specific to the chromophore.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One electrode emits RF while the other acts as the ground in monopolar RF technology (15). The effect of monopolar RF on laxity depends on all the factors above but mainly occurs as a result of uniform volumetric heating of the dermis (12).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of monopolar radiofrequency in middle and lower face laxity

Gökalp¹

2017

J Turgut Ozal Med Cent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: In recent years, radiofrequency (RF) systems have become one of the most commonly used rejuvenation methods, especially in the skin of the mid-lower face. In this study, the efficacy of monopolar RF energy in mid-lower face skin sagging was evaluated. Material and Methods: A total of 42 patients between the ages of 34 and 67 were included in this study. All patients underwent monopolar RF and were followed for 6 months. The monopolar RF energy level was determined based on the maximum level that each patient could tolerate. Patients were photographed with a digital camera before and 6 months after the procedure. The sagging grade of the mid-lower face before and after treatment was determined using the Merz skin laxity scale (MSLS). According to the MSLS, the level of laxity was divided into 5 groups: none, mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. The patient satisfaction levels were grouped into the following categories: not satisfied, minimally, well, and perfectly satisfied. Patients were monitored for side effects. Results: After the RF treatment, the mean MSLS score decreased from 2.60±0.80 to 1.86±0.87. The decrease in skin laxity after treatment was statistically significant (p=0.0001173). Patient satisfaction was correlated with treatment response (p=3.7x10-7). Erythema and edema were observed in all 42 patients; two patients complained of fat tissue reduction. Conclusion: Monopolar RF is an effective method for treating mid-lower face skin laxity. However, RF energy applied at high energy parameters may lead to thinning in the subcutaneous fat layer.

show abstract

“…3,[8][9][10] In the medical field, RF energy has been used for over 80 years. 2,11 The initial application of RF to medicine was electrocautery in 1920s, but now RF is widely used for many medical conditions, ranging from surgery for minimal invasive technique to aesthetic procedures.…”

Section: History Of Radiofrequencymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In dermatological field, RF devices have many aesthetic applications, including skin lifting and tightening, body contouring and cellulite reduction. [1][2][3] Recently, combining the fractional technique with a classical nonablative radiofrequency device has been introduced and revolutionized the field of skin rejuvenation. 1,[4][5][6][7] Fractional radiofrequency micro-needle (FRM) system delivers an exact amount of RF energy at accurate depth directly into the deep dermal area through micro-needle.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consensus Recommendations on the Use of a Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedle and Its Applications in Dermatologic Laser Surgery

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and ObjectivesFractional radiofrequency micro-needle (FRM) has revolutionized the way we treat a variety of cutaneous conditions using radiofrequency technology. A comprehensive guide is required for clinicians using this technology in treatment of a variety of skin conditions in various skin types. Materials and MethodsThe guidelines were made from a recent round table discussion among experienced clinicians and a review of recent medical literature. ResultsWe concluded that FRM is a safe and effective modality for treatment of conditions commonly encountered in dermatology, and recommended guidelines for optimal treatment of several skin conditions on and off the face using FRM. ConclusionWe developed reproducible guidelines for most effective treatment of a variety of skin conditions using FRM. Conduct of large, multicenter trials will be needed for further optimization of treatment parameters.

show abstract

Nonablative cutaneous remodeling using radiofrequency devices

Cited by 155 publications

References 21 publications

Efficacy of Ultrasound Cavitation, Tripollar Radiofrequency Lipolysis and Combination Therapy on Abdominal Adiposity

Efficacy of Ultrasound Cavitation, Tripollar Radiofrequency Lipolysis and Combination Therapy on Abdominal Adiposity

Efficacy of monopolar radiofrequency in middle and lower face laxity

Consensus Recommendations on the Use of a Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedle and Its Applications in Dermatologic Laser Surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About