2022
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive Chemical Sensing within Bulk Soil Using 1000 Biosensors Per Gram of Matrix

Abstract: Gene expression can be monitored in hard-to-image environmental materials using gas-reporting biosensors, but these outputs have only been applied in autoclaved matrices that are hydrated with rich medium. To better understand the compatibility of indicator gas reporting with environmental samples, we evaluated how matrix hydration affects the gas signal of an engineered microbe added to a sieved soil. A gas-reporting microbe presented a gas signal in a forest soil (Alfisol) when hydrated to an environmentally… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MSCs of varying complexity have been identified that can be stored and revived for soil studies. , These consortia represent an opportunity to advance soil biosensors by testing the compatibility of native soil microbes with indicator gas reporters. To investigate whether these reporters are compatible with MSC studies, we first evaluated whether individual MSC members present a gas signal that can be detected using GC-MS analysis. These measurements focused on five microbes from a chitin-degrading consortium of microbes, including Dyadobacter fermentans (Df), Ensifer adhaerens (Ea), Rhodococcus sp003130705 (Rh), Streptomyces sp001905665 (St), and Variovorax beijingensis (Vb).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…MSCs of varying complexity have been identified that can be stored and revived for soil studies. , These consortia represent an opportunity to advance soil biosensors by testing the compatibility of native soil microbes with indicator gas reporters. To investigate whether these reporters are compatible with MSC studies, we first evaluated whether individual MSC members present a gas signal that can be detected using GC-MS analysis. These measurements focused on five microbes from a chitin-degrading consortium of microbes, including Dyadobacter fermentans (Df), Ensifer adhaerens (Ea), Rhodococcus sp003130705 (Rh), Streptomyces sp001905665 (St), and Variovorax beijingensis (Vb).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate if soil affects the Vb gas signal, we evaluated the accumulation of CH 3 Br in the headspace of a soil containing different titers of Vb-mht (10 7 or 10 8 CFU) held at different hydration levels (32 or 64% field capacity). For these experiments, we used a Texas Alfisol, which we previously characterized . Soils were hydrated using MIDV1 containing 100 mM NaBr because this medium was designed to have an osmotic pressure closer to the range found in natural soil conditions .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Non-optical reporters have been used to build genetically encoded sensors for soil bacteria processes. The Silberg Lab developed a soil-functional reporter system using sensor circuits that biosynthesized indicator gaseous compounds, methyl bromide and ethylene [163,[209][210][211]. In their initial circuits, a ratiometric gas signal was generated by inducerregulated methyl halide transferase (MHT) expression/ methyl bromide production and constitutive ethylene forming enzyme (EFE) expression/ethylene production.…”
Section: Reporters For Monitoring Plant-bacteria Interactions Inmentioning
confidence: 99%