2019
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonempirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update

Abstract: The nuclear shell model has been perhaps the most important conceptual and computational paradigm for the understanding of the structure of atomic nuclei. While the shell model has been predominantly used in a phenomenological context, there have been efforts stretching back over a half century to derive shell model parameters based on a realistic interaction between nucleons. More recently, several ab initio many-body methods-in particular many-body perturbation theory, the no-core shell model, the in-medium … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

8
228
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 294 publications
(529 reference statements)
8
228
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A relatively healthy N = 28 gap is attested by the high lying E (2 + 1 ) excitation energy [16,22], which is one of the major indicators of a closed shell. The level scheme proposed for 45 Ar in [9] was also found to be well described in a singleparticle picture with little collectivity. Likewise, investigations of neutron-rich argon isotopes via neutron knockout reactions [23] portray 46 Ar as a seemingly "good" semimagic nuclide with a low observed cross section to the 3/2 − state in 45 Ar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A relatively healthy N = 28 gap is attested by the high lying E (2 + 1 ) excitation energy [16,22], which is one of the major indicators of a closed shell. The level scheme proposed for 45 Ar in [9] was also found to be well described in a singleparticle picture with little collectivity. Likewise, investigations of neutron-rich argon isotopes via neutron knockout reactions [23] portray 46 Ar as a seemingly "good" semimagic nuclide with a low observed cross section to the 3/2 − state in 45 Ar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We exploit all mass-measurement techniques of the ISOLTRAP spectrometer, including the phase-imaging ion-cyclotron-resonance (PI-ICR) method [24][25][26]. The data are interpreted in comparison to the large-scale shell model and to new calculations made with a beyond-mean-field (BMF) approach [27,28], as well as the ab initio valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG) [12,[29][30][31][32][33].The cadmium isotopes were produced at CERN's arXiv:2001.05075v2 [nucl-ex]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For details on the VS-IMSRG decoupling to derive the valence-space Hamiltonian, we refer to Refs. [12,[29][30][31][32][33]. When this ab initio valence-space Hamiltonian is diagonalized (here with the shell-model code ANTOINE [8]) some subset of eigenvalues of the full Hamiltonian should be reproduced when no IMSRG approximations are made.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, chiral EFT interactions have been combined with ab initio approaches that consider all nucleons in the solution of the nuclear many-body problem in studies of midmass nuclei up to tin [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Theoretical results are typically compared to the simplest experimental observables, namely, binding and excitation energies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we performed ab initio calculations with the VS-IMSRG [8,12,[61][62][63], based on the NN + 3N interaction labeled EM1.8/2.0 in Ref. [64].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%