2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonextensivity in geological faults?

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 clearly illustrates the superiority of the q values restricted in the range 1 < q < 2 to magnify differences of the S q and thus of the complexity as the global instability is approaching. It is worth mentioning that the nonextensive q parameters that clearly quantify the temporal evolution of the complexity in the D st time series are in full agreement with the upper limit q < 2 obtained from several studies involving the Tsallis nonextensive framework ( [33] and references therein). Moreover, they are in harmony with an underlying sub-extensive system, q > 1, verifying the emergence of strong interactions in the magnetosphere, especially during the occurrence of an intense magnetic storm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Figure 2 clearly illustrates the superiority of the q values restricted in the range 1 < q < 2 to magnify differences of the S q and thus of the complexity as the global instability is approaching. It is worth mentioning that the nonextensive q parameters that clearly quantify the temporal evolution of the complexity in the D st time series are in full agreement with the upper limit q < 2 obtained from several studies involving the Tsallis nonextensive framework ( [33] and references therein). Moreover, they are in harmony with an underlying sub-extensive system, q > 1, verifying the emergence of strong interactions in the magnetosphere, especially during the occurrence of an intense magnetic storm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Notice, the estimation for the nonextensive parameters is in full agreement with the upper limit q<2 obtained from several independent studies involving the Tsallis nonextensive framework (Vilar et al, 2007).…”
Section: An Estimation Of Tsallis Index Q For the Case Of Fracture Prsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The fragment-asperity model has been applied to various earthquake catalogs (SILVA et al 2006;VILAR et al 2007;TELESCA 2010aTELESCA , b, c, 2011TELESCA , 2012MICHAS et al 2013; In the fragment-asperity model framework the nonextensive parameter q M informs us about the scale of interactions between the fault planes and the fragments (MATCHARASHVILI et al 2011;PAPADAKIS et al 2013;TELESCA 2010b, c;VALVERDE-ESPARZA et al 2012). Thus, the increase of q M indicates that the physical state of a seismic area moves away from equilibrium.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%