1990
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199005000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Cardiac Output: Simultaneous Comparison of Two Different Methods with Thermodilution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…After an overnight fast (8-10 h), the subjects were positioned supine and a liver venous catheter (Cournand,7 Fr) (Appel et al 1986;Wong et al 1990). Total systemic vascular resistance (TVR) was the ratio of MAP to cardiac output.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an overnight fast (8-10 h), the subjects were positioned supine and a liver venous catheter (Cournand,7 Fr) (Appel et al 1986;Wong et al 1990). Total systemic vascular resistance (TVR) was the ratio of MAP to cardiac output.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices assume that impedance is exclusively a function of changes in intrathoracic blood; they are susceptible to electrical noise, electrode positioning, and pulmonary edema, and are not particularly accurate. [116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124] Bioreactance, in which the phase shift between the applied and measured voltage is correlated to stroke volume, was developed in an effort to reduce the sensitivity to artifact. 125 Advantages of bioimpedance and bioreactance devices include their completely noninvasive nature as well as their ability to provide continuous measurements.…”
Section: Technological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from comparative studies have been poor, with reported limits of agreement of 40-60% [29][30][31]. This failure is probably caused by excessive lung fluid [9].…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients who have suffered acute myocardial infarction [26], undergoing cardiac catheterisation [27] or neurosurgery [20,28], agreement with thermodilution has been acceptable (Ϯ 20-30%). However, unacceptable limits of agreement of Ϯ 40-60% have been repeatedly found in critically ill patients [29][30][31]. In general, results from studies in critically ill patients have shown that TEB cardiac output, when compared to thermodilution, over-estimates at low cardiac outputs and under-estimates at high cardiac outputs [32].…”
Section: A Summary Of Evaluation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation