2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-005-0634-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparasitic Nematoda provide evidence for a linear response of functionally important soil biota to increasing livestock density

Abstract: Soil acidity, nutrient availability and livestock density have a major influence on the belowground ecological community. As fast decomposition rates are due mostly to bacterial-based pathways and slower decomposition rates mostly to fungal-based pathways, it is helpful to condense empirical information in the so-called Nematode Channel Ratio (NCR). The NCR is shown to be a good indicator of efficiency in soil decomposition processes. We argue that in intensive agroecosystems, other fungivore members of the de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nematodes have promising characteristics as field bioindicators (Breure et al 2005) and a facultative self-fertilising reproduction that enables a laboratory finetuning (Walker et al 2000). The physiognomic characters of the nematodes' buccal cavities (Yeates et al 1993;Warwick and Clarke 1998) can be chosen to assess effects on the basal fauna (Mulder et al 2003a(Mulder et al , 2005d and to express the efficiency of soil decomposition processes (Table 1). In contrast to non-parasitic nematodes, collembolans (springtails) are often selective or even preferential species.…”
Section: Resources and Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nematodes have promising characteristics as field bioindicators (Breure et al 2005) and a facultative self-fertilising reproduction that enables a laboratory finetuning (Walker et al 2000). The physiognomic characters of the nematodes' buccal cavities (Yeates et al 1993;Warwick and Clarke 1998) can be chosen to assess effects on the basal fauna (Mulder et al 2003a(Mulder et al , 2005d and to express the efficiency of soil decomposition processes (Table 1). In contrast to non-parasitic nematodes, collembolans (springtails) are often selective or even preferential species.…”
Section: Resources and Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those root-derived compounds lost by exudation include low molecular mass exudates, secretions, polysaccharide mucilages and lysate (Bardgett et al 1998;Bonkowski 2004;Moore et al 2004;De Boer et al 2005). As the (infested) roots are an important source of carbon for microbes (Coleman et al 1983;Yeates et al 1998), it is likely that any changes of FOM in perennial grasslands may significantly affect the functional diversity and the metabolic activity of rhizosphere communities Bardgett et al 1999Bardgett et al , 2003Bardgett et al , 2005Beerling and Woodward 2001;Chapin and Eviner 2003;Cole et al 2004;Gange 1993;Klironomos et al 2000;Legendre and Rivkin 2002;Mulder et al 2003aMulder et al , 2005dScheu and Setälä 2002;Setälä 2002;Wardle 1995Wardle , 2002Wardle et al 1999 Enchytraeids and earthworms, nematode channel ratio, bacteria to fungi ratio, fresh organic matter, priming effect, soil organic matter, soil acidity (power of hydrogen) Breure 2004;Breure et al 2005;Didden 2003;Fontaine et al 2003Fontaine et al , 2004Ingham et al 1985;Laakso and Setälä 1999;Liiri et al 2002;Moore et al 2004;Mulder et al 2003aMulder et al , 2003bMulder et al , 2005aNeedham et al 2004;Scheu and Setälä 2002;Setälä 2002;…”
Section: Belowground Balance?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gaussian logistic regression is widely used in the assessment of aboveground-belowground relationships (Mulder et al 2005b). This stepwise model allows us to relate for each vascular host-plant its probability of occurrence p to a given chemical stressor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased land use results in rapid decline of soil organic matter due to reduced input rates and decreased physical protection to decomposition by cropping and tillage. Animals linked to either labile or recalcitrant substrates support the complementarity action of “energy transfer agents” (nematodes and enchytraeids) or “habitat engineers” (earthworms), and controversy exists over whether soil invertebrates control (‘bottom–up’) aboveground primary productivity, or whether belowground changes in soil invertebrates follow (‘top–down’) changes in agroecosystems [1][6]. Such opposite, controversial trends also contributed to several other relevant questions [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%