2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3367-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normalization of glomerular filtration rate in obese children

Abstract: Indexing of GFR to BSA calculated from the ideal-rather than actual-body weight is a promising approach to avoid overcorrection when studying obese children. Further studies should assess the accuracy of this approach across the full range of age and BMI distribution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of k was 0.55 for children and adolescent girls, while it was 0.7 for adolescent males . We normalized the eGFR to the ideal body weight‐derived body surface area …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of k was 0.55 for children and adolescent girls, while it was 0.7 for adolescent males . We normalized the eGFR to the ideal body weight‐derived body surface area …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 We normalized the eGFR to the ideal body weight-derived body surface area. 16 The presence of steatosis was detected using ultrasound imaging.…”
Section: Serum Creatinine (Mg/dl) Wasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since all current eGFR equations have been designed for GFR indexed with body surface area (BSA) 8 , eGFR was de-indexed using the BSA. BSA was estimated using the Haycock equation: BSA = 0.02465 × Wt 0.5378 × Ht 0.3964 (with Wt as weight in kilograms and Ht as height in centimetres) 26,27 . De-indexed eGFR was then calculated by multiplying eGFR values by BSA and dividing by 1.73 m 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice to receive generally used value (standard in 1.73 m 2 body surface), the absolute GFR value was multiplied by 1.73 and divided by the patients BSA, measured by the Haycock formula (17). To approve alternative GFR adapters by the ratio method, abso-lute GFR rates were divided by the value of body size descriptor, and received different GFR rates adapted to several body size descriptors (13). Hyperfiltration was determined as a GFR > 134.3 mL/min, in accordance with published reference ranges (27).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%