2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/821428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normative Findings for Periocular Anthropometric Measurements among Chinese Young Adults in Hong Kong

Abstract: Measurement of periocular structures is of value in several clinical specialties including ophthalmology, optometry, medical and clinical genetics, oculoplastic surgery, and traumatology. Therefore we aimed to determine the periocular anthropometric norms for Chinese young adults using a noninvasive 3D stereophotography system. Craniofacial images using the 3dMDface system were acquired for 103 Chinese subjects (51 males and 52 females) between the ages of 18 and 35 years. Anthropometric landmarks were identif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
29
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several works 10,[14][15][16][17][18]22 have anthropometrically analyzed facial features of different populations. However, discussions between those studies and the present work are somewhat difficult to make due to the notable genotypic (and thereby phenotypic) variation between races.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works 10,[14][15][16][17][18]22 have anthropometrically analyzed facial features of different populations. However, discussions between those studies and the present work are somewhat difficult to make due to the notable genotypic (and thereby phenotypic) variation between races.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An anthropometric analysis scheme developed for qualifying facial norms [Jayaratne et al 2013a; Jayaratne et al 2013b; Jayaratne et al 2014b; Jayaratne et al 2014c] was used with suitable modifications to suit the current project. Landmarks were identified by a single investigator (YSNJ) with significant experience in digital craniofacial anthropometry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, Aljunid & Ngeow 13 reported no significance difference in interpupillary distance (IPD) between their Malay and Chinese subjects. The reported ICD among the Chinese was from 34.7 mm to 40.01 mm 11 , 13 – 17 , and the IPD among the Chinese was from 61.4 mm to 64.8 mm 13 . In general, based on the soft tissue measurements and intercanthal distance, the Malay appears to have larger eyes that are located closer together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%